The existence of slavery helped to define the status of those blacks who did enjoy freedom. On the eve of the Civil War, nearly half a million free blacks lived in the United States, a majority in the South. Most were the descendants of slaves freed by southern owners in the aftermath of the Revolution or by the gradual emancipation laws of the northern states. Their numbers were supplemented by slaves who had been voluntarily liberated by their masters, who had been allowed to purchase their freedom, or who succeeded in running away.
When followed by “black” or “Negro,” the word “free” took on an entirely new meaning. Whites defined their freedom, in part, by their distance from slavery. But among blacks, wrote Douglass, “the distinction between the slave and the free is not great.” Northern free blacks, as noted in Chapter 10, generally could not vote and enjoyed few economic opportunities. Free blacks in the South could legally own property and marry and, of course, could not be bought and sold. But many regulations restricting the lives of slaves also applied to them. Free blacks had no voice in selecting public officials. Like slaves, they were prohibited from owning dogs, firearms, or liquor, and they could not strike a white person, even in self-defense. They were not allowed to testify in court or serve on juries, and they had to carry at all times a certificate of freedom. Poor free blacks who required public assistance could be bound out to labor alongside slaves. “Free negroes,” declared a South Carolina judge in 1848, “belong to a degraded caste of society” and should learn to conduct themselves “as inferiors.”
Table 11.3 FREE BLACK POPULATION, 1860
Region |
Free Black Population |
Percentage of Total Black Population |
North |
226,152 |
100% |
South |
261,918 |
6.2 |
Upper South |
224,963 |
12.8 |
Lower South |
36,955 |
1.3 |
Delaware |
19,829 |
91.7 |
Washington, D.C. |
11,131 |
77.8 |
Kentucky |
10,684 |
4.5 |
Maryland |
83,942 |
49.1 |
Missouri |
З.572 |
3.0 |
North Carolina |
30,463 |
8.4 |
Tennessee |
7,300 |
2.6 |
Virginia |
58,042 |
10.6 |
Alabama |
2,690 |
0.6 |
Arkansas |
144 |
0.1 |
Florida |
932 |
1.5 |
Georgia |
3,500 |
0.8 |
Louisiana |
18,647 |
5.3 |
Mississippi |
773 |
0.2 |
South Carolina |
9,914 |
2.4 |
Texas |
355 |
0.2 |
As noted above, nineteenth-century Brazil had a large free black population. In the West Indies, many children of white owners and female slaves gained their freedom, becoming part of a “free colored” population sharply distinguished from both whites above them and slaves below. In the absence of a white lower middle class, free blacks in Jamaica and other Caribbean islands operated shops and worked as clerks in government offices.
In the United States, a society that equated “black” and “slave” and left little room for a mulatto group between them, free blacks were increasingly considered an undesirable group, a potential danger to the slave system. By the 1850s, most southern states prohibited free blacks from entering their territory and a few states even moved to expel them altogether, offering the choice of enslavement or departure. Nonetheless, a few free blacks managed to prosper within slave society.
William Johnson, a Natchez barber, acquired enough money to purchase a plantation with fifteen slaves; he hunted with upper-class whites and loaned them money. But he suffered from the legal disadvantages common to his race. He could not, for example, testify against his debtors in court when they failed to pay. In Virginia, the slaves freed and given land by the will of Richard Randolph (noted in Chapter 6) established a vibrant community they called Israel Hill. Despite the legal restrictions on free blacks in the state, they prospered as farmers and skilled craftsmen, and they learned to defend their rights in court, even winning lawsuits against whites who owed them money.