180
1160–1393/1747–1973
1. The Sadōzays or Popalzays
|
⊘ 1160/1747 |
Aḥmad Khān Abdālī b. Muḥammad Zamān Khān, in Kandahar and Kabul |
|
⊘ 1184/1773 |
Tīmūr Shāh b. Aḥmad, in Herat, after 1189/1775 in Kabul |
|
⊘ 1207/1793 |
Zamān Shāh b. Tīmūr, in Kabul and Kandahar, after 1211/1797 in Herat |
|
⊘ 1215/1800 |
Maḥmūd Shāh b. Tīmūr, in Kabul and Kandahar, first reign |
|
⊘ (1218/1803 |
Qayṣar b. Zamān Shāh, in Kabul and Kandahar) |
|
⊘ 1218/1803 |
Shāh Shujā‘ b. Tīmūr, Shujā‘ al-Mulk, in Kabul and Kandahar, first reign, after 1233/1818 a pensioner of Britain in India |
|
⊘ (1222–3/1807–8 |
Qayṣar, in Kashmir) |
|
⊘ 1224/1809 |
Maḥmūd Shāh, in Kabul and Kandahar, in Herat until 1245/1829, second reign |
|
1233–41/1818–26 |
Period of civil war, with Bārakzay Sardārs in control and a series of puppet rulers in Kabul: ‘Alī Shāh b. Tīmūr,⊘ Ayyūb Shāh b. Tīmūr, Habīb Allāh b. ‘Aẓīm Khān |
|
⊘1233–58/1818–42 |
Kāmrān b. Maḥmūd Shāh, in Herat |
|
⊘ (1241/1826 |
Dūst Muḥammad b. Pāyinda Khān Bārakzay, in Kabul, after 1250/1834 with the title of Amīr, first reign) |
|
⊘1255/1839 |
Shāh Shujā‘, second reign, with British military support |
|
⊘ 1258/1842 |
Fatḥ Jang b. Shāh Shujā‘, in Kabul |
2. The Bārakzays or Muḥammadzays
|
⊘1259/1843 |
Dūst Muḥammad, in Kabul, in Kandahar 1272/1855 and in Herat 1279/1863 |
|
⊘ 1279/1863 |
Shīr ‘Alī b. Dūst Muḥammad, in Kabul, first reign |
|
⊘ 1283/1866 |
Muḥammad Afḍal b. Dūst Muḥammad, in Kabul |
|
⊘ 1284/1867 |
Muḥammad A‘ẓam b. Dūst Muḥammad, in Kabul |
|
⊘ 1285/1868 |
Shīr ‘Alī, in Kabul, second reign, d. 1296/1879 |
|
⊘ 1295–6/1878–9 |
Muḥammad Ya‘qūb Khān b. Shīr ‘Alī, regent for his father and then Amīr in Kabul after his death |
|
1296–7/1879–80 |
British occupation of eastern Afghanistan |
|
⊘ 1297/1880 |
‘Abd al-Raḥmān b. Muḥammad Afdal |
|
⊘ 1319/1901 |
Ḥabīb Allāh b. ‘Abd al-Raḥmān |
|
1337/1919 |
Naṣr Allāh b. ‘Abd al-Raḥmān, d. 1339/1921 |
|
⊘ 1337/1919 |
Aman Allāh b. Ḥabīb Allāh, d. 1379/1960 |
|
⊘ (1347/1929 |
Bachcha-yi Saqqa(w), as Ḥabīb Allāh II, k. 1348/1929) |
|
⊘ 1348/1929 |
Muḥammad Nādir b. Muḥammad Yūsuf b. Yaḥyā |
|
⊘ 1352–93/1933–73 |
Muḥammad Ẓāhir b. Nādir |
|
1393/1973 |
Republican regime established |
The Ghilzay Afghans had played a leading part in Persian affairs during the declining years of the Ṣafawids, overrunning and occupying much of Persia during the third decade of the eighteenth century (see above, no. 148). Although Nādir Shāh ended this Afghan domination, he recruited large numbers of Afghans into his forces. One of his leading commanders was Aḥmad Khān of the Sadōzay section of the Abdālī tribe of Afghans, a tribe which was originally from the Herat region but which Nādir allowed to settle around Kandahar. After Nādir’s assassination in 1160/1747, the Afghan troops aclaimed Aḥmad as their leader and as Shāh, and he assumed the title Durr-i Durrān ‘Pearl of Pearls’, whence the name Durrani which then became applied to the Abdālīs in general and to the dynasty which he now proceeded to found in particular. It is roughly from this time, also, that, under the stimulus of Aḥmad’s imperial ambitions and conquests, the name and the concept of ‘Afghanistan’ comes into existence and, for the first time, into literary and historical usage.
Aḥmad Shāh regarded himself as heir to Nādir’s eastern conquests, and invaded India several times, clashing with the Mughals, the Marāt́hās and the Sikhs, and in 1170/1757 sacking Delhi and Agra. A great empire was built up in north-western India, including Sind, Baluchistan, much of the Panjab and Kashmīr, and his victory at the third battle of Pānīpat in 1174/1761 checked the ambitions of the Marāt́hās and, among other things, indirectly enabled the British to consolidate their power in India from their Bengal base. In Khurasan, Aḥmad established a protectorate over Nādir’s descendant, the blind Shāh Rukh (see above, no. 149), although in the reign of Aḥmad’s grandson Zamān Shāh the Afghans were powerless to stem the Qājār annexation of Khurasan and the deposition of Shāh Rukh. The last years of the eighteenth century and the early decades of the nineteenth were, indeed, disastrous for the Durrani empire. The family was rent by internal feuds, with members of it at odds with each other from bases in the three key cities of the land, Kabul, Kandahar and Herat, and the Marāt́hās and Sikhs were able to eject the Afghans from most of their Indian possessions.
Meanwhile, the star of another branch of the Abdālīs, the Bārakzays or Muḥammadzays, was already rising. In 1233/1818, Dūst Muḥammad controlled Kabul, where he set up a puppet Sadōzay ruler, himself assuming the title of Amīr of Kabul some sixteen years later. With the loss of the Indian possessions, the Afghan kingdom was now a geographically compact unit, essentially one of mountains and plateaux, prolonged occupation of which by outside powers was extremely difficult to achieve, as British expeditions were to find during the course of the nineteenth century. Hence Afghanistan survived intact into the twentieth century, fighting off Persian ambitions regarding Herat, pressure from Imperial Russia in the north and two wars with Britain. Dūst Muḥammad resisted temptations to intervene in India, and remained indifferent to the rebels’ cause during the Indian Sepoy Mutiny. After the Second Afghan-British War, ‘Abd al-Raḥmān Khān established careful and correct relations with the Great Powers, and this policy was only broken by the impetuousness of Aman Allāh in 1337/1919, provoking the Third Afghan-British War. His later, over-hasty attempts at the modernisation of a profoundly conservative and traditionalist Islamic society led to his abdication. The throne passed to another branch of the family, which retained power until monarchical rule was replaced in 1393/1973 by a republican régime under the last king’s cousin Muḥammad Dāwūd b. Muḥammad ‘Azīz b. Muḥammad Yūsuf, the prelude to a Communist takeover of the country and its being plunged into a period of bloody warfare which still continues today.
Lane-Poole, 330–5; Zambaur, 304–5.
EI2 ‘Afghanistan. V. History’ (M. Longworth Dames).
M. Longworth Dames, ‘The coins of the Durrānls’, NC, 3rd series, 8 (1888), 325–63.
L. White King, ‘History and coinage of the Bārakzai dynasty of Afghānistān’, NC, 3rd series, 16(1896), 276–344.
W. K. Fraser-Tytler, Afghanistan. A Study of Political Developments in Central and Southern Asia, 3rd edn, London 1967, with a genealogical table of the Bārakzays on p. 346.
Louis Dupree, Afghanistan, Princeton 1973, Parts III-IV.
Vartan Gregorian, The Emergence of Modern Afghanistan. Politics of Reform and Modernization, 1880–1946, Stanford CA 1969.