80

The Bāwandid Ispahbadhs

45–750/665–1349

The highlands of Ṭabaristān and Gīlān

1. The line of the Kawusiyya (Ṭabaristān), with their centre at Firrīm

45/665

Bāw, ? Ispahbadh of Ṭabaristān

60/680

Interregnum of Walash

68/688

Surkhāb I b. Bāw

98/717

Mihr Mardān b. Surkhāb I

138/755

Surkhāb II b. Mihr Mardān

155/772

Sharwín I b. Surkhāb II

before 201/before 817

Shahriyār I b. Qārin

210/825

Shāpūr or Ja‘far b. Shahriyār I

210–24/825–39

Seizure of power by Māzyār b. Qārin b. Wandād-Hurmuzd

224/839

Qārin I b. Shahriyār I, Abu ‘1-Mulūk

253/867

Rustam I (? b. Surkhāb) b. Qārin

282/895

Sharwīn II b. Rustam I

318/930

Shahriyār II b. Sharwīn II

⊘ c. 353–69/c. 964–80

Rustam II b. Sharwīn II

358/969

Dārā b. Rustam II

⊘ c. 376/c. 986

Shahriyār III b. Dārā

396/1006

Rustam III b. Shahriyār III

449–66/1057–74

Qārin II b. Shahriyār III

466/1074

Disappearance of their rule

2. The line of the Ispahbadhiyya (Ṭabaristān and Gīlan), with their centre at Sārī

⊘ c. 466/c. 1074

Shahriyār b. Qārin, Husām al-Dawla

c. 508/c. 1114

Qārin b. Shahriyār, Najm al-Dawla

511/1117

Rustam I b. Qārin, Shams al-Mulūk

⊘ 511/1118

‘Alī b. Shahriyār, ‘Alā’ al-Dawla

⊘ c. 536/c. 1142

Shāh Ghāzi Rustam b. ‘Alī, Nuṣrat al-Dīn

⊘ 560/1165

Ḥasan b. Shāh Ghāzi Rustam, ‘Alā’ al-Dawla Sharaf al-Mulūk

568/1173

Ardashīr b. Ḥasan, Ḥusām al-Dawla

602–6/1206–10

Rustam II b. Ardashīr

606/1210

Khwārazmian and then Mongol rule in Ṭabaristān

3. The line of the Kīnkhwāriyya (vassals of the Il Khānids), with their centre at Āmul

635/1238

Ardashīr b. Kīnkhwār, Ḥusām al-Dawla

after 647/after 1249

Muḥammad b. Ardashīr, Shams al-Mulūk

c. 669/c. 1271

‘Alī b. Ardashīr, ‘Alā’ al-Dawla

c. 669/c. 1271

Yazdagird b. Shahriyār, Tāj al-Dawla

c. 700/c. 1300

Shahriyār b. Yazdagird, Nāṣir al-Dawla

c. 710/c. 1310

Kay Khusraw b. Yazdagird, Rukn al-Dawla

728/1328

Sharaf al-Mulūk b. Kay Khusraw

734–50/1334–49

Ḥasan b. Kay Khusraw, Fakhr al-Dawla

750/1349

Succession in Māzandaran of the Afrāsiyābids

The Bāwandids were the longest-lived of the petty Caspian dynasties, with a history extending over some six or seven centuries, a remarkable demonstration of how the region’s isolation from the mainstreams of Islamic Persian life allowed a degree of family continuity unusual in the Islamic world. They claimed descent from one Bāw and traced their genealogy back beyond this to the Sāsānid emperor Kawādh. Their original centre was at Firrīm in the eastern section of the Elburz chain running through Ṭabaristān.

That part of the dynasty’s history which can be reasonably well documented only begins with the Arab invasions of Ṭabaristān in the opening years of the ‘Abbāsid caliphate. This was the time when the Bāwandids and the rival house of the Qārinids were vying for power there, a rivalry which in the ninth century was to end spectacularly in the rebellion and fall of Māzyār b. Qārin (224/839). It was also at this last juncture that the Ispahbadhs at last became definitively Muslim. Subsequently, they opposed the Zaydi Imams in lowland Ṭabaristān, and were involved during the tenth century in the struggles of the Būyids and the Ziyārids (see above, no. 75, and below, no. 81) for control of northern Persia, being linked with both these houses through marriage; it was during the times when they became vassals of the Būyids that the Bāwandids adhered to Twelver Shī’ims.

This first line faded out, and the affiliation to it of the subsequent line is not certain. These Ispahbadhiyya were firmly Twelver Shī’īs. Within a framework of vassalage to the Great Seljuqs, they managed to preserve their local authority; at times they sheltered Seljuq claimants and made high-level marriages with the Seljuqs. The decline of Great Seljuq power in the mid-twelfth century allowed the vigorous and assertive Shāh Ghāzī Rustam to became a major, independent figure in the politics of northern Persia; he combated the Ismā’īlīs of Alamūt (see below, no. 101) and pursued an independent policy aimed at extending his principality south of the Elburz. However, the rising power of the Khwārazm Shāhs (see below, no. 89) in the early years of the thirteenth century brought this line to an end, with direct power exercised in Māzandarān (as Ṭabaristān becomes generally called after the twelfth century).

The Bāwandids were restored after an interval of three decades in the shape of a collateral branch, the Kīnkhwāriyya, who ruled as vassals of the Mongol Il Khānids, with their capital at Āmul, until another local family of Māzandarān, that of Kiyā Afrāsiyāb Chulābl, overthrew them and ended Bāwandid rule for ever.

Justi, 431–2; Sachau, 5–7 nos 3–5; Zambaur, 187–9; Album, 34–5.

EI2‘Bāwand’ (R. N. Frye); EIr ‘Āl-e Bāvand’ (W. Madelung).

H. L. Rabino, Tes dynasties du Māzandarān’, 409–37, with a genealogical table at p. 416.

G. C. Miles, The coinage of the Bāwandids of Ṭabaristān’ in C. E. Bosworth (ed.), Iran and Islam, in memory of the late Vladimir Minorsky, Edinburgh 1971, 443–60.

W. Madelung, in The Cambridge History of Iran, IV, 200–5, 216–18.

If you find an error or have any questions, please email us at admin@erenow.org. Thank you!