Chapter One
The images you may have viewed of the British Army during the Second World War in a range of magazines, original newspapers and new books originated most probably from the work of the AFPU and yet little is widely known about how they worked and indeed who they were. Most of the images presented in this publication also originate from the work of the Army Film and Photographic Unit and the others have come via the US Information Service when based at the US Embassy in London. So, before advancing any further in our consideration of the Sherman M4 Tank it is appropriate to consider the work of the cameramen briefly. The cinematographers and stills cameramen, many of whom gave their lives in efforts to record the war both as a diary for the army but also for us, are certainly owed due credit.
No.1 Army Film and Photographic (AFPU) was formed in London during 1941 as the Sherman design was being developed in North America and put into production. It originally consisted of twenty-six Sergeant cameramen, both still and movie, under the control of Major David Macdonald. Recruited to create a unit with a common aim, these men had responded to calls for troops with experience of the film industry or still photography in a professional capacity. They were given only two objectives – to record The Desert War for newsreels and press, and to create images for official army records. Shipped to Cairo in November of 1941 they were attached to the 8th Army in preparation for filming the desert campaign. After a delay due to their camera equipment being lost at sea when the ship transporting it was sunk, replacement De Vry and Eyemo cameras caught up with them. Their cameras were not the best available, and to capture some of the shots in this book cameramen had to position themselves in highly exposed positions. With no telephoto lens equivalents, they indeed had to be in the action, to get the photograph. Next they began to attach themselves to the various fighting units in the desert. Many problems hindered first efforts, not least the desert conditions. No transport had been allocated to the AFPU, therefore the cameramen would have to hitch rides with the fighting troops. This created initial animosity toward them as only being armed with camera and spare film some jealousy was felt by the combat troops. The reaction the first cameramen probably received was something like ‘Ain’tcha got a rifle then mate?’
The one positive environmental element in their favour was the superb lighting which the desert sun provided on clear dry days. You will appreciate this from the North African and Mediterranean series of photographs you view some sixty years on. Coverage they achieved was limited by their lack of transport, and therefore much early footage only captured air attacks at distance. Little early wartime photography showed an enemy at a personal range. After the Afrika Korps pushed the 8th Army back to El Alamein, recapturing Tobruk on the way, the Army Film Unit was reassigned to 8th Army HQ. Understanding of the AFPU’s work increased with growing recognition, and the unit was seen as a more valuable asset for morale than at first thought. With the direction of the war about to reverse the encouragement of Home Front morale was something to be protected. This helped facilitate better access to the battlefield for the AFPU men, brought acceptance and further expansion. From that point on cameramen were teamed with stills photographers, two to a jeep and let free to chase their story. Something only the freelance journalists can hope for under modern battlefield conditions today. AFPU jeep teams based with 8th Army HQ could roam at will rather than be attached to a single assigned battalion. The resulting footage from these forays appeared in the films ‘Desert Victory’ and ‘Tunisian Victory’ plus hundreds of still photographs, a handful of which are featured in this book.
In recent years it has been the fashion to focus only on the small collection of footage from the North African campaign which is known to have been faked by pressmen associated with the AFPU. I must emphasise that recent research has shown this was a minute amount compared with the bulk of their work. The majority of cameramen worked professionally under conditions of extreme danger – AFPU members were killed accompanying a Commando raid on Tobruk, and many were captured as their forward positions were overrun in all campaigns. Of the initial 26 members of No.1 AFPU: Four cameramen were killed, five wounded and four taken prisoner leaving just 13 cameramen and a tally sheet showing fifty per cent losses.
After the fall of Tunis, No.1 and No.2 AFPUs joined together. No.2 had followed the Americans through the campaign while No1 had been attached to the 8th Army. The amalgamation of the two groups, with new replacement staff allowed the concentrated effort of much greater coverage and was just in time for the invasion of Sicily in 1943. Preparations took place in Tripoli and they later covered the beach assaults, Cassino battles and the drive to Naples and onto Rome. AFPU Officer Alan Whicker beat General Mark Clark into Rome and was there, waiting, to capture his entry into the city. Further teams were being assembled in the UK in readiness for the assault on Northwest Europe and much of the well recognised Normandy invasion film footage and photography stems from the work of expanded AFPU units. By 1944, the AFPU had become an accepted part of how British war reporting was taking place. No. 5 AFPU Section was set up especially to cover the Normandy Campaign. Anywhere between a dozen and two dozen stills cameramen would be in the field at any one time. Images they captured on film would be sent to the War Office for censorship and then to the Ministry of Information (MOI) Photographs Division for additional vetting and further distribution if passed. The amphibious landings in Normandy promised incredible opportunities for these photographers, and they rarely missed them in capturing the emotion and look of the campaign that followed. It was AFPU Sgt Photographer Mapham who sprinted ashore on Queen sector of Sword Beach to make history with one famous photograph: an image that again crossed the globe during the 60th Anniversary of D-Day in June 2004. Turning at the top of the beach, he raised his Super Ikonta camera and focussed on a scene which captured men of the 13/18th Hussars helping wounded comrades ashore through the early morning mist and smoke from the bombardment of the shoreline.
BUT WHY NO COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS?
Colour film stock was a total rarity in Britain for most of the Second World War years but miniscule amounts were available for official purposes from mid-war. Small amounts were also privately purchased from outlets when on leave overseas or from wealthy American officers who were having Kodak stock shipped from the States. During the NW Europe campaign it was hardly ever available, and certainly not to the AFPU Sergeant photographers. The officers who did manage to inherit colour stock retained it for special occasions such as celebrations, ceremonial parades, portraits or off duty poses. Consider the books you have purchased on the war and you will see little has ever found its way into the public domain. Another reason for not using colour film was that a market for the finished product did not exist at home in wartime Britain nor with publications elsewhere in the Commonwealth. There was very limited opportunity for magazines and papers to reproduce colour prints back on the mainland. Severe restrictions had been placed upon the National Press in order to save inks, but the greater purpose was to impress upon the public the air of wartime austerity and gravitas. In the tradition of the wartime slogan ‘Make Do and Mend’ – It was black and white photography only for the duration!
ORDERS FOR CAMERA MEN ON THE BATTLEFIELD
The photographers of AFPU were encouraged to compose photo-stories in their official guidelines produced by the MOI (Ministry of Information). ‘Sergeant Photographer… This Is Your Job’ (1942) listed the publicity and propaganda purposes of official British photography. It focussed upon topical news stories, the importance of selecting ‘the sturdiest, toughest types’ as subjects, but also pleaded that ‘cheery stuff’ could be overdone. It closed with the warning: ‘You must go out to treat subjects seriously!’ Onward through the liberation of Paris, the crossing of the Belgian-Dutch border on 21 September, 1944 and the liberation of Brussels. The AFPU men continued recording the progress of the campaign in NW Europe as they were doing in Italy. They relentlessly filmed the Airborne assaults mid 1944, XXX Corps’ efforts to reach Arnhem and events in the Ardennes, the snow covered mountain battles in Italy. The natural barrier of the Rhine river in NW Europe saw them preparing for the Rhine Crossing operation to take place on 24 March 1945, but they could not yet envisage the sights that would greet them within the month on reaching Belsen Camp. The impact of the AFPU photographs taken at Belsen were also of enormous evidential significance.
During the NW European campaign these men took approximately 25,000 images alone which were distributed throughout Britain, her Allies and the rest of the world. Their work in North Africa, The Far East, Mediterranean and Europe offers us a unique account of the range of human experience of war. From the routine everyday duty to those monumental events that denote the way-points of history the AFPU legacy, and those of the freelance US photo-journalists has provided the backbone for this and many historical publications.
Take a moment to acknowledge and remember their efforts in recording a World War on film.