Algra, K., J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld, and M. Schofield, eds. 1999. The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.
Annas, J. 1995. “Aristotelian Political Theory in the Hellenistic Period.” In Laks and Schofield 1995: 74–94.
Arena, V. 2012. Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.
Arweiler, A. 2003. Cicero rhetor: Die “Partitiones oratoriae” und das Konzept des gelehrten Politikers. Berlin.
Asmis, E. 2004. “The State as a Partnership: Cicero’s Definition of res publica in His Work On the State.” History of Political Thought 25: 569–98.
Asmis, E. 2005. “A New Kind of Model: Cicero’s Roman Constitution in De re publica.” AJP 126: 377–416.
Astin, A. E. 1967. Scipio Aemilianus. Oxford.
Atkins, J. W. 2013. Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and Laws. Cambridge.
Atkins, J. W. 2018. “Non-domination and the libera res publica in Cicero’s Republicanism.” History of European Ideas 44: 756–73.
Auvray-Assayas, C. 2001. “Réécrire Platon? Les enjeux du dialogue chez Cicéron.” In F. Cossutta and M. Narcy, ed. La Forme dialogue chez Platon: Évolution et réceptions. Grenoble. 237–55.
Auvray-Assayas, C. 2015. “Le dialogue cicéronien ou le livre éloquent.” In S. Dubel and S. Gotteland, ed. Formes et genres du dialogue antique. Paris. 127–36.
Badian, E. 1956. “P. Decius P.f. Subulo: An Orator of the Time of the Gracchi.” JRS 46: 91–96.
Badian, E. 1964. Studies in Greek and Roman History. Oxford.
Badian, E. 1969. “Quaestiones Variae.” Historia 18: 447–91.
Badian, E. 1984. “The Death of Saturninus.” Chiron 14: 101–47.
Baraz, Y. 2012. A Written Republic: Cicero’s Philosophical Politics. Princeton.
Barlow, J. 2012. “Cicero on Property and the State.” In Nicgorski 2012: 212–41.
Barnes, J. 1986. “Is Rhetoric an Art?” d.a.r.g. Newsletter (Discourse Analysis Research Group, University of Calgary) 2.2: 2–22.
Barnes, J. 1997. “Roman Aristotle.” In Barnes and Griffin 1997: 1–69.
Barnes J. and M. Griffin, eds. 1997. Philosophia Togata II. Oxford.
Barwick, K. 1963. Das rednerische Bildungsideal Ciceros. Berlin.
Becker, E. 1938. Technik und Szenerie des ciceronischen Dialogs. Osnabrück.
Beness, J. L. 2005. “Scipio Aemilianus and the Crisis of 129 B.C.” Historia 54: 37–48.
Berger, A. 1953. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. Philadelphia.
Bishop, C. 2019. Cicero, Greek Learning, and the Making of a Roman Classic. Oxford.
Boyancé, P. 1936. Etudes sur le Songe de Scipion. Limoges.
Bréguet, E., ed. 1980. Cicéron: La République. Paris.
Bretone, M. 1978. “Cicerone e i giuristi del suo tempo.” Ciceroniana 3: 47–68.
Briscoe, J. 1974. “Supporters and Opponents of Tiberius Gracchus.” JRS 64: 125–35.
Brittain, C. 2001. Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics. Oxford.
Broughton, T. R. S. 1946. “Notes on Roman Magistrates. I. The Command of M. Antonius in Cilicia. II. Lucullus’ Commission and Pompey’s Acta.” TAPA 77: 35–43.
Brouwer, R. 2017. “‘Richer than the Greeks’: Cicero’s Constitutional Thought.” In Höffe 2017: 33–46.
Brüllmann, P. 2017. “Die Einrichtung des besten Staates: De re publica, Buch IV.” In Höffe 2017: 91–109.
Büchner, K. 1962. Studien zur römischen Literatur II: Cicero. Wiesbaden.
Büchner, K. 1969. “Cicero an den Imperator Lentulus de re publica.” In P. Steinmetz, ed. Politeia und Res Publica: Beiträge zum Verständnis von Politik, Recht und Staat in der Antike dem Andenken Rudolf Starks gewidmet. Wiesbaden. 215–44.
Büchner, K. 1984. M. Tullius Cicero: De re publica. Heidelberg.
Buckland, W. W. 1963. A Textbook of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian. Ed. 3, rev. P. Stein. Cambridge.
Calboli Montefusco, L. 1986. La dottrina degli “status” nella retorica greca e romana. Hildesheim.
Calboli Montefusco, L. 1991. “Die Topik in der Argumentation.” In G. Ueding, ed. Rhetorik zwischen den Wissenschaften: Geschichte, System, Praxis als Probleme des “Historischen Wörterbuchs der Rhetorik.” Tübingen. 21–34.
Cancelli. F. 1972. “Iuris Consensu nella definizione ciceroniana di res publica.” RCCM 14: 247–67.
Cancelli, F. 1973. “Per l’interpretazione del De legibus di Cicerone.” RCCM 15: 185–245.
Christes, J. 1989. “Bemerkungen zu Cicero, De re publica 1,60; 2,21–22; 2,30; 3,33.” Gymnasium 96: 38–48.
Classen, C. J. 1986. “Ciceros orator perfectus: ein vir bonus dicendi peritus?” In S. Prete, ed. Commemoratio: Studi di filologia in rocordi do Riccardo Ribuoli. Sassoferrato. 43–55.
Cole, S. 2013. Cicero and the Rise of Deification at Rome. Cambridge.
Corbeill, A. 2002. “Rhetorical Education in Cicero’s Youth.” In J. May, ed. Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden. 23–48.
Cornell, T. J. 2001. “Cicero on the Origins of Rome.” In Powell and North 2001: 41–56.
Crawford, J. 1994. M. Tullius Cicero: The Fragmentary Speeches. Atlanta.
Crawford, M., ed. 1996. Roman Statutes. London.
Dahlmann H. and R. Heisterhagen. 1957. Varronische Studien I: Zu den Logistorici. Mainz.
DeGraff, T. 1940. “Plato in Cicero.” CP 35: 143–53.
Dillon, J. 2016. “The Reception of Aristotle in Antiochus and Cicero.” In A. Falcon, ed. Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity. Leiden. 181–201.
Dombart B. and A. Kalb, eds. 1928. Sancti Aurelii Augustini Episcopi De Civitate Dei Libri XXII. Ed. 4. Leipzig.
Dorandi, T. 2009. “La Tradizione papirologica di Eraclide Pontico.” In Fortenbaugh and Pender 2009: 1–25.
Dugan, J. 2005. Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford.
Dyck, A. 1996. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor.
Dyck, A. 1998. “Cicero the Dramaturge.” In G. Schmeling and J. Mikalson, ed. Qui Miscuit Utile Dulci: Festschrift Essays for Paul Lachlan Mackendrick. Wauconda. 151–64.
Dyck, A. 2008. “Rivals into Partners: Hortensius and Cicero.” Historia 57: 142–73.
Earl, D. C. 1963. Tiberius Gracchus: A Study in Politics. Brussels.
Eckert, A. 2018. “Roman Orators between Greece and Rome: The Case of Cato the Elder, L. Crassus, and M. Antonius.” In C. Gray, A. Balbo, R. Marshall, and C. Steel, ed. Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions. Oxford. 19–32.
Edelstein, L. 1962. “Platonic Anonymity.” AJP 83: 1–22.
Elliott, J. 2007. “The Voices of Ennius’ Annals.” In Fitzgerald and Gowers 2007: 38–54.
Engels, D. 2007. Das römische Vorzeichenwesen (753–27 v. Chr.). Stuttgart.
Engberg-Pedersen, T. 2017. From Stoicism to Platonism: The Development of Philosophy, 100 BCE–100 CE. Cambridge.
Fantham, E. 1973. “Aequabilitas in Cicero’s Political Theory, and the Greek Tradition of Proportional Justice.” CQ 23: 285–90.
Fantham, E. 2004. The Roman World of Cicero’s De oratore. Oxford.
Ferrary, J.-L. 1974. “Le Discours de Laelius dans le troisième livre du De re publica de Cicéron.” MEFRA 86: 745–71.
Ferrary, J.-L. 1977. “Le Discours de Philus (Cicéron, De re publica, III, 8–31) et la philosophie de Carnéade.” REL 55: 128–56.
Ferrary, J.-L. 1984. “L’archéologie du De re publica (2.2, 4–37,63): Cicéron entre Polybe et Platon.” JRS 74: 87–98.
Ferrary, J.-L. 1987. “Cicéron (De re publica 3, 35, 48) et les institutions rhodiennes.” In S. Boldrini et al., ed. Filologia e forme letterarie: studi offerti a Francesco della Corte. Urbino. 2: 247–52.
Ferrary, J.-L. 1995. “The Statesman and the Law in the Political Philosophy of Cicero.” In Laks and Schofield 1995: 48–73.
Ferrary, J.-L. 2007. “Les Philosophes grecs à Rome (155–86 av. J.-C.).” In A. M. Ioppolo and D. Sedley, ed. Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers: Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 BC. Naples. 19–46.
Ferrary, J.-L., A. Schiavone, and E. Stolfi. 2019. Quintus Mucius Scaevola: Opera. Rome.
Finkelberg. M. 2019. The Gatekeeper: Narrative Voice in Plato’s Dialogues. Leiden.
Fitzgerald W. and E. Gowers, eds. 2007. Ennius Perennis: The Annals and Beyond. Cambridge.
Fleischer, K. 2019. “Carneades: The One and Only.” JHS 139: 116–24.
Fortenbaugh W. and E. Pender, eds. 2009. Heraclides of Pontus. New Brunswick.
Fortenbaugh W. and E. Schütrumpf, eds. 2001. Dicaearchus of Messana. New Brunswick.
Fox, M. 2007. Cicero’s Philosophy of History. Oxford.
Fox, M. 2009. “Heraclides of Pontus and the Philosophical Dialogue.” In Fortenbaugh and Pender 2009: 41–67.
Frede, D. 1989. “Constitution and Citizenship: Peripatetic Influence on Cicero’s Political Conceptions in the De re publica.” In W. Fortenbaugh and P. Steinmetz, ed. Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos. New Brunswick. 77–132.
Frede, M. 1992. “Plato’s Arguments and the Dialogue Form.” In J. Klagge and N. Smith, ed. Methods of Interpreting Plato and His Dialogues. Oxford. 201–19.
Frier, B. 1985. The Rise of the Roman Jurists. Princeton.
Fuhrer, T. 2017. “Politiker und Philosophen: Cicero zur Interdependenz von politischer Theorie und Praxis (De re publica 1, 1–37).” In Höffe 2017: 19–32.
Gaillard, J. 1975. “Que représentent les Gracques pour Cicéron?” Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 34: 499–529.
Gallagher, R. 2001. “Metaphor in Cicero’s De re publica.” CQ 51: 509–19.
Garbarino, G. 1973. Roma e la filosofia greca dalle origini alla fine del II secolo A.C. Torino.
Gawlick, G. and W. Görler. 1994. “Cicero.” In H. Flashar, ed. Die Philosophie der Antike, Band 4: Die hellenistische Philosophie. Basel. 995–1168.
Gee, E. 2013. Aratus and the Astronomical Tradition. Oxford.
Gilbert, N., M. Graver, and S. McConnell, ed. forthcoming. Power and Persuasion in Cicero’s Philosophy. Cambridge.
Gildenhard, I. 2007. Paideia Romana: Cicero’s “Tusculan Disputations.” Cambridge.
Gildenhard, I. 2011. Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.
Gildenhard, I. 2013a. “Of Cicero’s Plato: Fictions, Forms, Foundations.” In Schofield 2013: 225–75.
Gildenhard, I. 2013b. “Cicero’s Dialogues: Historiography Manqué and the Evidence of Fiction.” In S. Föllinger and G. Müller, ed. Der Dialog in der Antike: Formen und Funktionen einer literarischen Gattung zwischen Philosophie, Wissenvermittlung and dramatischer Inszenierung. Berlin. 234–74.
Gill, C. 1996. “Afterword: Dialectic and the Dialogue Form in Late Plato.” In C. Gill and M. M. McCabe, ed. Form and Argument in Late Plato. Oxford. 283–311.
Goldberg, S. 2005. Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.
Görgemanns, H. 1968. “Die Bedeutung der Traumeinkleidung im Somnium Scipionis.” Wiener Studien 2: 46–69.
Görler, W. 1974. Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Philosophie. Heidelberg.
Görler, W. 1988. “From Athens to Tusculum: Reconsidering the Background of Cicero’s De oratore.” Rhetorica 6: 215–35. Reprinted in Görler 2004: 172–92.
Görler, W. 1990. “Cicero zwischen Politik und Philosophie.” Ciceroniana n.s. 7: 61–73. Reprinted in Görler 2004: 158–71.
Görler, W. 1995. “Silencing the Troublemaker: De legibus 1.39 and the Continuity of Cicero’s Skepticism.” In Powell 1995: 85–113. Reprinted in Görler 2004: 240–67.
Görler, W. 2001. “Sokrates bei Cicero.” In H. Kessler, ed. Sokrates: Nachfolge und Eigenwege. Zug. 233–59. Reprinted in Görler 2004: 312–33
Görler, W. 2004. Kleine Schriften zur hellenistisch-römischen Philosophie, ed. C. Catrein. Leiden.
Görler, W. 2017. “Roman Philosophy? A Ciceronian Ambition.” In Y. Lieberson, I. Ludlam, and A. Edelheit, ed. For a Skeptical Peripatetic: Festschrift in Honor of John Glucker. Sankt Augustin. 220–32.
Gottschalk, H. 1980. Heraclides of Pontus. Oxford.
Gowing, A. 2000. “Memory and Silence in Cicero’s Brutus.” Eranos 98: 39–64.
Graver M. forthcoming. “The Psychology of Honor in Cicero’s De re publica.” In Gilbert et al. forthcoming.
Gruen, E. 1966. “Political Prosecutions in the 90’s BC.” Historia 15: 32–64.
Gruen, E. 1968. Roman Politics and the Criminal Courts, 149–78 B.C. Cambridge MA.
Gruen, E. 1990. Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Leiden.
Hagendahl, H. 1967. Augustine and the Latin Classics. Göteborg.
Hahm, D. 1995. “Polybius’ Applied Political Theory.” In Laks and Schofield 1995: 7–47.
Hahm, D. 2000. “Kings and Constitutions: Hellenistic Theories.” In Rowe and Schofield 2000: 457–76.
Hall, J. 1994. “Persuasive Design in Cicero’s De oratore.” Phoenix 48: 210–25.
Hall, J. 1996. “Social Evasion and Aristocratic Manners in Cicero’s De oratore.” AJP 117: 95–120.
Hall, J. 1998. “Cicero to Lucceius (Fam. 5.12) in Its Social Context: Valde Bella?” CP 93: 308–21.
Hall, J. 2009. Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. Oxford.
Harder, A., ed. 2012. Callimachus: Aetia. Oxford.
Harder, R. 1960. Kleine Schriften. Munich.
Harries, J. 2006. Cicero and the Jurists: From Citizens’ Law to the Lawful State. London.
Harrison, S. 1990. “Cicero’s ‘De temporibus suis’: The Evidence Reconsidered.” Hermes 118: 455–63.
Heck, E. 1966. Die Bezeugung von Ciceros Schrift De re publica. Hildesheim.
Heinze, R. 1960. Vom Geist des Römertums. Ed. 3. Darmstadt.
Hendrickson, G. L. 1906. “Literary Sources in Cicero’s Brutus and the Technique of Citation in Dialogue.” AJP 27: 184–99.
Hine, H. 2016. “Philosophy and philosophi: From Cicero to Apuleius.” In G. Williams and K. Volk, ed. Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford. 13–29.
Hirzel, R. 1895. Der Dialog: Ein literarhistorischer Versuch. Leipzig.
Hodgson, L. 2017a. Res Publica and the Roman Republic: “Without Body or Form.” Oxford.
Hodgson, L. 2017b. “‘A Faded Reflection of the Gracchi’: Ethics, Eloquence and the Problem of Sulpicius in Cicero’s De oratore.” CQ 67: 163–81.
Höffe, O., ed. 2017. Ciceros Staatsphilosophie: Ein kooperativer Kommentar zu De re publica und De legibus. Berlin.
Hoffmann, E., ed. 1899–1900. Sancti Aurelii Augustini Episcopi De Civitate Dei Libri XXII. Vienna.
Hösle, V. 2008. “Cicero’s Plato.” Wiener Studien 121: 145–70.
Hösle V. 2012. The Philosophical Dialogue: A Poetics and a Hermeneutics, transl. S. Rendall. Notre Dame.
Kahn, C. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge.
Kallet-Marx, R. 1990. “The Trial of Rutilius Rufus.” Phoenix 44: 122–39.
Kaster, R., ed. 1995. C Suetonius Tranquillus: De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus. Oxford.
Kaster, R. 2006. Cicero: Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius. Oxford.
Kaster, R. 2020. Cicero: Brutus and Orator. Oxford.
Kennedy, G. 1972. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 300 B.C.–A. D. 300. Princeton.
Kennedy, G. 1994. A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton.
Könczöl, M. 2008. “Law, Fact and Narratives in Ancient Rhetoric: The Case of the causa Curiana.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 21: 21–33.
Kroll, W. 1903. “Studien über Ciceros Schrift de oratore.” RhM 58: 552–97.
Kroymann, J. 1958. “Die Stellung des Königtums im I. Buch von Ciceros Staat.” HSCP 63: 309–32.
Kupreeva, I. 2009. “Heraclides’ On Soul (?) and Its Ancient Readers.” In Fortenbaugh and Pender 2009: 93–138.
Laks A. and M. Schofield, eds. 1995. Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy. Cambridge.
Laughton, E. 1964. The Participle in Cicero. Oxford.
Lenel, O. 1889. Palingenesia Iuris Civilis. Leipzig.
Lévi, N. 2014. La Révélation finale à Rome: Cicéron, Ovide, Apulée. Paris.
Lévy, C. 1992. Cicero academicus: Recherches sur les Académiques et sur la philosophie cicéronienne. Rome.
Long, A. A. 1995. “Cicero’s Plato and Aristotle.” In Powell 1995: 37–61.
Long A. A. and D. N. Sedley. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Vol. 1: Translations of the Principal Sources, with philosophical commentary. Cambridge.
Mai, A., ed. 1822. M. Tulli Ciceronis de re publica quae supersunt. Rome.
Manuwald, G., ed. 2019. Fragmentary Republican Latin: Oratory. Cambridge MA.
Marinone, N. and E. Malaspina. 2004. Cronologia ciceroniana. Ed. 2. Bologna.
Marquez, X. 2012. “Between Urbs and Orbis: Cicero’s Conception of the Political Community.” In Nicgorski 2012: 181–211.
Marsh, C. 2012. “A Legal Semiotics Framework for Exploring the Origins of Hermagorean Stasis.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 25: 11–29.
Matthes. D. 1958. “Hermagoras von Temnos 1904–1955.” Lustrum 3: 58–214.
Matthes, D., ed. 1962. Hermagoras Fragmenta. Leipzig.
May, J. and J. Wisse, transl. 2001. Cicero on the Ideal Orator. Oxford.
McConnell, S. 2012. “Cicero and Dicaearchus.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 42: 307–49.
McConnell, S. 2014. Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters. Cambridge.
McConnell, S. 2017. “Magnitudo Animi and Cosmic Politics in Cicero’s De re publica.” CJ 113: 45–70.
McConnell, S. 2019. “Cicero and Socrates.” In C. Moore, ed. Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates. Leiden. 347–66.
Mercati, G. 1934. M. Tulli Ciceronis de re publica libri e codice rescripto Vaticano 5757 phototypice expressi. Vol. 1: Prolegomena. Vatican.
Merklin, H. 1987. “System und Theorie in Cicero’s ‘De Oratore.’” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 13: 149–61.
Meyer, R. D. 1970. Literarische Fiktion und historischer Gehalt in Ciceros De oratore. Stuttgart.
Michel, A. 2003. Les Rapports de la rhétorique et de la philosophie dans l’oeuvre de Cicéron. Ed. 2. Louvain.
Milton, J. 1958. Prose Writings. London.
Mirhady, D. 2001. “Dicaearchus of Messana: The Sources, Text and Translation.” In Fortenbaugh and Schütrumpf 2001: 1–142.
Mitchell, T. 1975. “The Volte-Face of P. Sulpicius Rufus in 88 B.C.” CP 70: 197–204.
Mitchell, T. 1991. Cicero: The Senior Statesman. New Haven.
Moatti, C. 2015. The Birth of Critical Thinking in Republican Rome, transl. J. Lloyd. Cambridge.
Moatti, C. 2018. Res Publica: Histoire romaine de la chose publique. Paris.
Moles, J. 2000. “The Cynics.” In Rowe and Schofield 2000: 415–34.
Moraux, P. 1957. A la recherche de l’Aristote perdu: Le Dialogue “Sur la Justice.” Louvain.
Morstein-Marx, R. 2004. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.
Müller, J. 2017. “Ciceros Archäologie des römischen Staates in De re publica II: Ein Exempel römischen Philosophierens.” In Höffe 2017: 47–71.
Negri, G. 2009. “Cicerone come ‘fonte di cognizione’ del diritto privato romano. L’esempio della causa Curiana: appunti per una ricerca.” Ciceroniana N.S. 13: 165–83.
Nelsestuen, G. 2014. “Overseeing res publica: The Rector as Vilicus in De Re Publica 5.” Classical Antiquity 33: 130–73.
Nenci, F., ed. 2008. Cicerone: La repubblica. Milan.
Nicgorski, W., ed. 2012. Cicero’s Practical Philosophy. Notre Dame.
North, J. A. 1990. “Democratic Politics in Republican Rome.” Past & Present 126: 3–21.
Ogilvie, R. 1965. A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5. Oxford.
Pédech, P. 1991. “Deux Grecs face à Rome au Ie siècle av. J.-C.: Métrodore de Scepsis et Théophane de Mitylène.” REA 93: 65–78.
Perelli, L. 1971. “L’Elogio della vita filosofica in De re publica I, 26–29.” Bollettino di studi latini 7: 389–401.
Perelli, L. 1972. “Natura e ratio nel II libro del De re publica Ciceroniano.” RFIC 100: 295–311.
Perrin-Saminadayar, E. 2017. “La Fréquentation romaine des philosophes athéniens: Entre curiosité intellectuele et obligation sociale.” In P. Vesperini, ed. Philosophari: Usages romains des savoirs grecs sous la République et sous l’Empire. Paris. 112–24.
Pöschl, V. 1936. Römischer Staat und griechisches Staatsdenken bei Cicero. Berlin.
Powell, J. G. F., ed. 1988. Cicero Cato maior de senectute. Cambridge.
Powell, J. G. F. 1994. “The rector rei publicae of Cicero’s De Republica.” SCI 13: 19–29.
Powell, J. G. F., ed. 1995. Cicero the Philosopher. Oxford.
Powell, J. G. F. 2012. “Cicero’s De Re Publica and the Virtues of the Statesman.” In Nicgorski 2012: 14–42.
Powell, J. G. F. 2013. “The Embassy of the Three Philosophers to Rome in 155 BC.” In C. Kremmydas and K. Tempest, ed. Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change. Oxford. 219–47.
Powell J. G. F. and J. North, eds. 2001. Cicero’s Republic. London.
Rawson, E. 1972. “Cicero the Historian and Cicero the Antiquarian.” JRS 62: 33–45.
Rawson, E. 1975. Cicero: A Portrait. London.
Rawson, E. 1991. Roman Culture and Society: Collected Papers. Oxford.
Reinhardt, T. 2003. Cicero’s Topica. Oxford.
Reitzenstein, R. 1924. “Zu Cicero De re publica.” Hermes 59: 356–62.
Richter, W. 1969. “Einige Rekonstruktions- und Quellenprobleme in Cicero De re publica: II & III.” RFIC 97: 273–95.
Rosenstein, N. 1986. “Imperatores Victi: The Case of C. Hostilius Mancinus.” CA 5: 230–52.
Rowe C. and M. Schofield, eds. 2000. The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge.
Schiavone, A. 2012. The Invention of Law in the West. Cambridge MA.
Schmidt, E. A. 2017. “Das Somnium Scipionis im Kontext des dritten Bücherpaares (De re publica V und VI).” In Höffe 2017: 133–48.
Schmidt, P. L. 1969. Die Abfassungszeit von Ciceros Schrift über die Gesetze. Rome.
Schneider, W. C. 1998. Vom Handeln der Römer: Kommunikation und Interaktion der politischen Führungsschicht vor Ausbruch des Bürgerkriegs im Briefwechsel mit Cicero. Hildesheim.
Schofield, M. 1991. The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge.
Schofield, M. 1995. “Cicero’s Definition of Res Publica.” In Powell 1995: 63–83.
Schofield, M. 1999. “Social and Political Thought.” In Algra et al. 1999: 739–70.
Schofield, M. 2000. “Epicurean and Stoic Political Thought.” In Rowe and Schofield 2000: 435–56.
Schofield, M. 2008. “Ciceronian Dialogue.” In S. Goldhill, ed. The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge. 63–84.
Schofield, M., ed. 2013. Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC. Cambridge.
Schofield, M. 2017a. “Cicero’s Plato.” In Engberg-Pedersen 2017: 47–66.
Schofield, M. 2017b. “Cicero on Imperialism and the Soul.” In R. Seaford, J. Wilkins, and M. Wright, ed. Selfhood and the Soul: Essays on Ancient Thought and Literature in Honor of Christopher Gill. Oxford. 107–24.
Schofield, M. 2021. Cicero: Political Philosophy. Oxford.
Schulz, F. 1946. History of Roman Legal Science. Oxford.
Schütrumpf, E. 1990. “Cicero De oratore I and Greek philosophical tradition.” Rh. Mus. 133: 310–21.
Schütrumpf, E., P. Stork, J. van Ophuijsen, and S. Prince, eds. 2008. Heraclides of Pontus. New Brunswick.
Sedley, D. N. 1997. “Plato’s Auctoritas and the Rebirth of the Commentary Tradition.” In Barnes and Griffin 1997: 110–29.
Sedley, D. N. 1998. Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge.
Sedley, D. N. 2013. “Cicero and the Timaeus.” In Schofield 2013: 187–205.
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1965–70. Cicero’s Letters to Atticus. Cambridge.
Sharples, R. 1985. “Plato’s Phaedrus-argument for Immortality and Cicero’s Somnium Scipionis.” LCM 10.5: 66–67.
Sharples, R. 1986. “Cicero’s Republic and Greek Political Theory.” Polis 5.2: 30–50.
Skutsch, O. 1985. The Annals of Quintus Ennius. Oxford.
Smethurst, S. E. 1952. “Cicero and Dicaearchus.” TAPA 83: 224–32.
Smethurst, S. E. 1953. “Cicero and Isocrates.” TAPA 84: 262–320.
Solmsen, F. 1933. “Die Theorie der Staatsformen bei Cicero De re publ. I.” Philologus 88: 326–41.
Solmsen, F. 1968. Kleine Schriften. Hildesheim.
Spahlinger, L. 2005. Tulliana simplicitas: Zu Form und Funktion des Zitats in den philosophischen Dialogen Ciceros. Göttingen.
Stahl, W. H., transl. 1952. Macrobius: Commentary on the Dream of Scipio. New York.
Steel, C. 2005. Reading Cicero: Genre and Performance in Late Republican Rome. London.
Steidle, W. 1952. “Einflüsse römischen Lebens und Denkens auf Ciceros Schrift De oratore.” Museum Helveticum 9: 10–41.
Steinmetz, F. 1969. “Staatengründung—aus Schwäche oder natürlichem Geselligkeitsdrang? Zur Geschichte einer Theorie.” In P. Steinmetz, ed. Politeia und Res Publica. Wiesbaden. 181–99.
Stevenson, T. 2005. “Readings of Scipio’s Dictatorship in Cicero’s De re publica (6.12).” CQ 55: 140–52.
Straumann, B. 2016. Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. Oxford.
Stull, W. 2011. “Deus ille noster: Platonic Precedent and the Construction of the Interlocutors in Cicero’s De oratore.” TAPA 141: 247–63.
Sumner, G. V. 1973. The Orators in Cicero’s Brutus. Toronto.
Taylor, L. R. 1949. “On the Chronology of Ciceros’ Letters of 56–55 B.C.” CP 44: 217–21.
Tutrone, F. 2013. “Libraries and Intellectual Debate in the Late Republic: The Case of the Aristotelian Corpus.” In J. König, K. Oikonomopoulou, and G. Woolf, ed. Ancient Libraries. Cambridge. 152–66.
van den Berg, C. 2021. The Politics and Poetics of Cicero’s Brutus: The Invention of Literary History. Cambridge.
van der Blom, H. 2010. Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.
van der Eijk, P. 2009. “The Woman not Breathing.” In Fortenbaugh and Pender 2009: 237–50.
Vaughn, J. W. 1985. “Law and Rhetoric in the Causa Curiana.” Classical Antiquity 4: 208–22.
Volk, K. 2002. The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius. Oxford.
Volk, K. 2013. “The Genre of Cicero’s De consulatu suo.” In T. Papanghelis, S. Harrison, and S. Frangoulidis, ed. Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature: Encounters, Interactions and Transformations. Berlin. 93–112.
Volk K. 2021. The Roman Republic of Letters: Scholarship, Philosophy, and Politics in the Age of Cicero and Caesar. Princeton.
Volk, K. and J. E. G. Zetzel. forthcoming. Cicero: De Amicitia. Cambridge.
von Arnim, H. 1898. Leben und Werke des Dio von Prusa. Berlin.
West, M. 1978. “‘Not without Dust and Heat’: A Ciceronianism in Milton’s Areopagitica.” Review of English Studies 29: 181–85.
White, S. 2001. “Principes Sapientiae: Dicaearchus’ Biography of Philosophy.” In Fortenbaugh and Schütrumpf 2001: 195–236.
Wiseman, T. P. 1971. New Men in the Roman Senate 139 B.C.–14 A.D. Oxford.
Wisse, J. 1989. Ethos and Pathos from Aristotle to Cicero. Amsterdam.
Wisse, J. 2017. “Philosophers and Gentlemen: The Orator Crassus’s Quaestorship, Philosophers’ Deaths and Historical Realities in Cicero’s De oratore.” In A. Groton, ed. Ab omni parte beatus: Classical Essays in Honor of James M. May. Mundelein IL. 121–59.
Wissowa, G. 1912. Religion und Kultus der Römer. Ed. 2. Munich.
Wlassak, M. 1912. “Praescriptio und bedingter Prozeß.” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Romanistische Abteilung 33: 81–159.
Woerther, F., ed. 2012. Hermagoras: Fragments et témoignages. Paris.
Woolf, R. 2015. Cicero: The Philosophy of a Roman Sceptic. London.
Zarecki, J. 2014. Cicero’s Ideal Statesman in Theory and Practice. London.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1972. “Cicero and the Scipionic Circle.” HSCP 76: 173–79.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1995. Cicero, De re publica: Selections. Cambridge.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1996. “Natural Law and Poetic Justice: A Carneadean Debate in Cicero and Virgil.” CP 91: 297–319.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1998. “De re publica and De rerum natura.” In P. Knox and C. Foss, ed. Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. Stuttgart. 232–49.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2001. “Citizen and Commonwealth in De re publica Book 4.” In Powell and North 2001: 83–97.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2003. “Plato with Pillows: Cicero on the Uses of Greek Culture.” In D. Braund and C. Gill, ed. Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies on Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Liverpool. 119–38.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2006. Review of Dugan 2005. CP 101: 429–33.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2007. “The Influence of Cicero on Ennius.” In Fitzgerald and Gowers 2007: 1–16.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2011. “‘Arouse the Dead’: Mai, Leopardi and Cicero’s Commonwealth in Restoration Italy.” In W. Brockliss et al., ed. Reception and the Classics. Cambridge. 19–44.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2013a. “A Contract on Ameria: Law and Legality in Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino.” AJP 134: 425–44.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2013b. “Political Philosophy.” In C. Steel, ed. Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge. 181–95.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2014. “The Bride of Mercury: Confessions of a ’Pataphilologist.” In S. Pollock, B. Elman, and K. Chang, ed. World Philology. Cambridge MA. 45–62.
Zetzel, J. E. G., transl. 2017a. Cicero: On the Commonwealth and on the Laws. Ed. 2. Cambridge.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2017b. “Cicero on the Origins of Civilization and Society: The Preface to De re publica Book 3.” AJP 138: 461–87.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2017c. “The Attack on Justice: Cicero, Lactantius, and Carneades.” Rh. Mus. 160: 299–319.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2018. Critics, Compilers, and Commentators: A Guide to Roman Textual and Grammatical Scholarship. Oxford.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2019. “Natural Law and Natural Language in the First Century BCE.” In G. Pezzini and B. Taylor, ed. Nature and Language in the Classical Roman World. Cambridge. 191–211.
Zetzel, J. E. G. forthcoming. “Cicero’s Platonic Dialogues.” In Gilbert et al. forthcoming.
Ziegler, K., ed. 1969. M. Tulli Ciceronis De re publica. Ed. 7. Leipzig.
Zoll, G. 1962. Cicero Platonis Aemulus. Zurich.