PREFACE

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is a complex disease that causes illnesses ranging from mild to severe respiratory problems. It is caused by a novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), an enveloped, positive-sense, and single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) virus that belongs to the coronavirus family. It has a fast-spreading potential worldwide, which leads to high death cases regardless of lows death rates. Yet, there are no animal models or specific drugs for disease prevention and/or treatment. Therefore, it is highly demanded to identify the known drugs and test them as a possible therapeutic approach. In this critical situation, one or more of these drugs may represent the only option to treat or reduce the severity of the disease until a specific drug or vaccine is developed and approved. A wide variety of therapeutics have been explored to treat COVID-19, initially suggested for other diseases and already established safety profiles, and approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Such treatments are referred to by the World Health Organization (WHO) as repurpose medications. Still, there are many ongoing clinical trials regarding the safety and effectiveness of repurposing immune-therapeutics to mitigate the symptoms of COVID-19.

In this book volume-2 proposal, we consolidate the various animal models and treatment strategies widely used for the global emergency of COVID-19. Since SARS-CoV-2 is the closest to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, the approaches brought here will be similar and/or varying with a slight degree. It is cleared that in the last 17-18 years, this is the third outbreak of the same coronavirus with a small mutation that shock the whole world. The chapters in this book should be prioritized as up-to-date literature of techniques used in the study SARS-CoV-2 and will act as a suitable reference if any such wary appear soon.

The 2nd volume of the proposed book proposal has been classified into Part IV: Models for SARS-CoV-2 and Part V: Treatment Strategies for SARS-CoV-2. With the emergence of new coronavirus variants, epidemiology, different host tropism permits a thorough analysis of their evolution and acquired adaptability to their host. The 1st volume already discussed the entry, epidemiology, genetic alteration, and diagnostic approaches. In the 2nd volume, part IV, we have planned to describe chapter-wise models used in COVID-19. No studies are complete without animal models closely related to human physiology to replicate the disease and observe the pathology conditions as in human cases. Such animal models play a vital role in virus pathogenesis and prepare a therapeutic immune response. Here describe bio-engineered transgenic mouse model inserting with specific genes, or CRISPR-Case9 gene-editing tool has been used previously for SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. The chapter will deal with culture techniques or cell lines for COVID-19-also histopathology of COVID-19, essential proteins that up or down-regulate SARS-CoV-2. The last chapter of this part will describe other diseases having similar signs and symptoms and their differentiation. In the last part of the book proposal, part V, chapters will deal with therapeutic approaches to attenuate SARS-CoV-2 as there is no specific treatment available to date, just symptomatic therapy. However, scientists will elucidate effective antiviral drugs in clinical trials, phytochemicals, photomedicine such as ultraviolet A & B, homemade remedies, blood plasma transfusion, stem cell therapy, and computational approaches in vivo and in vitro trials.

This book will appear as a baseline for academicians, scientists, and health professionals as still, research is going to overcome this outbreak of COVID-19, the novelty of best animal models, and find an effective treatment. However, just a single book proposal like this wouldn't have flourished without enthusiasm and determined publishers' and investigators' strength to take time from their busy schedule and subsidize on time.

We thank the whole investigators who contributed, directly and indirectly, to bring it to reality.

Kamal Niaz

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology

Faculty of Bio-Sciences, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences

Bahawalpur-63100

Pakistan

&

Muhammad Farrukh Nisar

Department of Physiology and Biochemistry

Faculty of Bio-Sciences, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (CUVAS)

Bahawalpur-63100

Pakistan

List of Contributors

Abdullah

Department of Pharmacy, University of Malakand, Chakdara Dir Lower, KPK, Pakistan

Ahmad Farooq

Department of Biological Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Aadil Javed

Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey

Abhinav Anand

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, PIN- 144 411, India

CT Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, CT Group of Institutions, Shahpur, Jalandhar, Punjab, PIN- 144 020, India

Amjad Islam Aqib

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Amna Ahmad

Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Ahmed Abdelmajed Alkhodary

Ministry of Health, Gaza Governorates, Palestine

International Centre for Casemix and Clinical Coding, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Afshan Shafi

Department of Food Science and Technology, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan

Ahmad Uddin

Drug Discovery Research Centre, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

Devesh Tewari

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, PIN- 144 411, India

Faisal Siddique

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (CUVAS), Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Firasat Hussain

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Fazlullah Khan

Department of Allied Health Sciences, Bashir Institute of Health Sciences, Bharakahu, Islamabad, Pakistan

Ihtisham Ulhaq

Department of Biosciences, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), 45550, Pakistan

Iqra Muzammil

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Ismail Shah

Department of Pharmacy, Garden Campus, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan

Iyad Ibrahim Shaqura

Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Ministry of Health, Gaza Governorates, Palestine

Kamal Niaz

Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Faculty of Bio-Sciences, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan

Kashif Akram

Department of Food Sciences, Faculty of Bio-Sciences, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Kashif Rahim

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (CUVAS), Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Laiba Hassan

Department of Microbiology, The University of Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan

Maqsood ur Rehman

Department of Pharmacy University of Malakand, Chakdara Dir Lower, Cholistan University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Pakistan

Muhammad Mazhar Munir

Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Faculty of Bio-Sciences, Cholistan University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Muhammad Mazhar Ayaz

Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Muhammad Ibrar

Department of Allied Health Sciences, Iqra University Peshawar, Swat Campus, KPK, Pakistan

Muhammad Farrukh Nisar

Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Bio-Sciences, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (CUVAS), Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Muhammad Yasir Waqas

Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Bio-Sciences, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (CUVAS), Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Muhammad Ali Syed

Department of Microbiology, The University of Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan

Mohammad Ejaz

Department of Microbiology, The University of Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan

Muhammad Ali Syed

Department of Microbiology, The University of Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan

Navneet Khurana

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, PIN- 144 411, India

Neha Sharma

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, PIN- 144 411, India

Ovais Sideeq

School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran

Qaisar Tanveer

Institute of Pharmacy, Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Qudratullulah

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (CUVAS), Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Sana Muzammal

Department of Mathematics, National College of Business Administration and Economics, Sub-Campus Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Shaukat Hussain Munawar

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Bio-Sciences, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (CUVAS), Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Sonali Bajaj

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, PIN- 144 411, India

Tapan Behl

Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India

Tean Zaheer

Department of Parasitology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Zahid Manzoor

Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Faculty of Bio-Sciences, Cholistan University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Part I: Models for COVID-19

Genetically Engineered Mouse Models for COVID-19

Aadil Javed1, *, Kamal Niaz2, Ovais Sideeq3

1 Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey

2 Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Faculty of Bio-Sciences, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan

3 School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Previous severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) outbreaks resulted in a cohort of preclinical studies that utilized various mice models for determining the pathogenesis of the infection, including the viral replication, spread, and mortality of the disease. Such studies have provided a framework upon which new investigations have been launched for understanding the outbreak of new coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) causing viral agents and their interaction with the host and its body. Recent investigations showed that the previous SARS-CoV and the recently discovered severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) both require the spike S protein to enter the host cell upon infection the binding with the receptors on the surface of the cells. The viral entry also requires proteases from the host cells. Since there are key similarities between the structure of the viruses and the construct of the viral transmission along with the spread inside the host's body in animal models. They were developed for the previous viral agent. The disease can be emulated or manipulated to bring forth novel investigations leading to key data that can broaden the sphere of COVID-19 studies being conducted. There are several different options to choose the right animal model for the question being raised in the experimental design with the pathogenesis of COVID-19. This chapter focused on the already established animal models for other coronavirus outbreaks and some of the strategies that can be exploited to develop new animal models. For COVID-19, research aimed at targeting the therapy or basic investigations for understanding cellular or organ level mechanisms involved in the disease.

Keywords: COVID-19, Knockout, Mouse models, SARS-CoV-2, Transgenic.


* Corresponding author Aadil Javed: Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey. E-mail: adiljaved313@hotmail.com

INTRODUCTION

In December 2019, a novel coronavirus outbreak was reported in Wuhan, China which caused a pandemic and is an ongoing public health concern worldwide [1]. The disease known as coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which leads to deadly pneumonia and severe health issues related to lung damage [2]. The genomic properties of the viral agent responsible for the local epidemic in China were timely shared across the scientific community. Since then, a valiant effort to combat the disease and understanding the agent responsible for the pandemic has been ongoing. Across the world, millions of people have been affected by the pandemic leading to a change in lifestyle globally [3-5]. The diverse scientific community took upon understanding the pandemic and the viral agent responsible for the COVID-19 from the get-go during the earlier days of the pandemic in 2020 [6]. Millions of people have been infected, and hundreds of thousands of people have lost their lives due to the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak [7]. Various attempts have been reported to classify the epidemiological features of the pandemic, including the case fatality rate, reproduction number, and recovery rate. To date, it is being assumed that various factors that affect the rigorous testing and other socio-economic factors hamper any progress in determining the true features of the pandemic [8-13].

The SARS-CoV-2 virus belonging to the Coronaviridae family of the virus has been studied extensively due to the urgency of pandemics. The vaccine development approaches have been challenging so far, and various mouse models have been utilized for understanding different aspects of the physiology of this novel coronavirus. Previously, the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and SARS candidates for vaccines were evaluated in the different mouse models [14, 15]. The clinical features, including the pathogenesis of the coronavirus, can be studied in great detail upon the development of animal models that can efficiently mimic the properties of the disease. For this purpose, numerous models have been developed in animals such as hamsters, guinea pigs, mice, cats, and rabbits, etc., [16-20]. The major receptor of SAR-CoV is angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and is utilized to develop transgenic mouse models containing the human ACE2 gene [21]. Rhesus macaques were the first animal model for vaccine development against MERS-CoV, showing the symptoms of the infections as seen in clinical patients [22]. Golden Syrian hamsters were also used as animal models for establishing the vaccine candidate's safety and viral pathogenesis for different strains of SARS-CoV [19]. NSP16 CoV attenuated vaccine development approaches utilized mice as well [23]. Developing animal models, MERS-CoV had several drawbacks due to the inefficiency of the virus being replicated in the respiratory system. Therefore, new approaches like gene targeting paved the way for demonstrating modified models containing genes of interest or lack thereof for more naturalized infectivity of the virus, e.g., human DPP4 transgenic mice [24]. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) the system has been efficiently employed for developing mouse models that are engineered to get infected by the virus and show high replication [25, 26]. Small animals like rabbits and mice are used to develop mouse models specific for a particular infection such as SAR-CoV-2 for various reasons, including efficacy, cost issues, and manipulation approaches. There is still much work that is needed to better understand the behavior of COVID-19 and transgenic animal models can efficiently smoothen the process of understanding due to ease in receptor identification, protection, pathogenesis models and immune response studies [15, 27]. Various applications and interference points for different types of mouse models in understanding or combating SARS have been depicted in Fig. (1). The aim of this chapter is to summarize the well-known animal models that can be used for coronavirus along with some of the strategies that can be exploited to develop new animal models for COVID-19 as a model to target the therapy or basic investigations the underline molecular mechanisms involved in the disease.

Emerging Role of CRISPR/Cas9

In molecular diagnostics, CRISPR, and the Cas protein-containing CRISPR-Cas systems, have advanced the process of functional research. Since its discovery almost 30 years ago, the field of genome editing using CRISPR systems has been revolutionized [28]. In clinical sciences and modern molecular biology approaches, CRISPR-Cas9 systems are routinely applied for targeting the cells of mammalian origin involving gene editing methodology [29]. Such approaches have been utilized to detect Zika virus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus along with nucleic acid detection-based diagnosis procedures that use RNA-guided or RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems [30-32]. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, CRISPR-Cas13 approached for diagnostic applications are being considered [33]. The potential for this technology is deemed as tremendous, as described by Xiang et al. [34]. A fast and accurate method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 is the need for the hour, and SHERLOCK protocols can provide the scientific community an approach that has huge potential in this area. A recently reported DETECTR assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 via employing CRISPR leads to a 95% positive prediction along with a 100% negative prediction agreement in a real-time RT-PCR [35]. Genome-wide CRISPR screens were employed to determine the therapeutic targets for COVID-19. Apart from already established protease cathepsin and receptor ACE2, SWI/SNF chromatin complex proteins that comprise the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) signaling network were also identified using the technology [36]. The protocol for designing a transgenic mouse model for SARS-CoV-2 that conforms to the CRISPR-Cas9 technology has also been reported recently [37]. Such models can successfully provide representativeness of the infection with tissue specificity of the human genes as well [37].

Fig. (1))

Experimental animals of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2. The coronaviruses with high infectivity and pathogenicity break the species barrier and infect humans in the past two decades. Besides NHP, mice, hamsters, ferrets, and rabbits, the other possible natural hosts might be able to support the studies of coronavirus infection, pathogenesis, and drug discovery.

Human ACE2 Expression

A carboxypeptidase named ACE2, which is encoded by the gene ACE2 resides on chromosome Xp22. It gives rise to a type I type transmembrane protein containing an extracellular N-terminal domain with carboxypeptidase which is heavy, and a short C-terminal domain having a cytoplasmic tail intracellularly [38, 39]. The SARS-CoV binding site in ACE2 is present on the N-terminal peptidase domain [40]. Cellular ACE2 manifests in either soluble or membrane-bound form and is usually expressed in pneumocytes and enterocytes located in the small intestine [41]. Vascular endothelial cells located in the heart, brain, and kidneys also exhibit ACE2 expression [42, 43]. The major site of infection for the coronavirus, especially SARS-CoV, is the respiratory tract. In human airway epithelia and lung parenchyma, ACE2 is expressed and is considered the receptor for these coronaviruses. SARS-CoV also seemed to infect the differentiated epithelial cells more than undifferentiated cells as the differentiated epithelia are reported to have higher expression of ACE2 receptor via SARS S protein [44].

ACE2 gene in humans produces the protein receptor that is identified by SARS coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV and NL63, along with the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus that caused the pandemic of 2020 [45]. In vitro studies suggest that SARS-CoV infection correlates with the expression of the ACE2 receptor. The variations or mutations in the ACE2 sequence lead to a reduced association or linkage between the spike protein on the SARS-CoV or NL63 with the ACE2 receptor [40, 46]. It has been concluded that the severity, susceptibility, or even the symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection is dependent on the expression of the receptor ACE2. Recently, ACE2 expression levels from single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments concluded that Asian males show higher expression of the receptor [47]. However, more studies need to be conducted to profile a linkage with ethnicities based on ACE2 expression and COVID-19 epidemiological features. The overall function of ACE2 in different populations and the genetic background correlations, are yet to be understood in detail [48]. A systematic analysis of variants of ACE2 (coding region variants) that can influence the expression pattern has been performed. The genetic analysis from microarray data showed that the East Asian populations have a higher allelic frequency of different eQTL variants associated with higher expression of ACE2. More studies on the pilot data need to be performed in other populations to report concrete evidence related to receptor and virus spike protein [49].

ACE2 Knockout Mouse for Acute respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Investigation

Major causes of death resulting from SARS include acute lung injury along with ARDS. ACE2 knockout mice are reported to be protected from infections by SARS [50]. Moreover, studies showing data from knockout ACE2 receptors have depicted that the spike protein of the virus can cause the downregulation of the ACE2 expression and ACE2 being involved in the protection of lungs from acute injury of the lungs [50, 51]. The introduction of recombinant ACE2 protein can reduce ARDS in mice due to the angiotensin and renin pathway [51]. Moreover, knockout ACE2 mice have been reported to be more prone to impaired lung functionality and exacerbated fibrosis of the lung along with reduced exercise capacity when compared with wild-type mice [52]. In another investigation, knockout ACE2 mice depicted an increased level of lung edema, increased vascular permeability and demonstrated severe lung disease [51].

On the one hand, knockout ACE2 shows severe lung disease, the introduction of recombinant ACE leads to elevated symptoms related to ARDS [53]. It can be deduced from the studies on knockout ACE2 models that ACE2 is a key factor involved in the pathogenesis of SARS viruses and could be the most promising target for therapy that does not include the immunization procedures that can target ARDS. Based on the data obtained through knockout studies, recombinant human ACE2 studies showed promising results in improving the pulmonary circulatory hemodynamics and arterial hypoxemia associated with ARDS [54]. ACE2 knockout mice are known to be resistant to SARS infection as the viral titers determined from the knockout model were a hundred thousand folds lower than the wild-type mice lungs [50].

K18-hACE2 Transgenic Mouse

Coronaviruses, especially those that cause SARS, infect many animal species, including ferrets, mice, cynomolgus, hamsters, and rhesus macaques, among others [55]. Apart from different types of coronaviruses available for studies that demonstrate the infectivity comparable to human coronaviruses. The clinical disease that arises from infection by the SARS-CoV is difficult to replicate in animals in terms of clinical signs and severity as observed in the patients. To determine the vaccine efficacy along with the overall pathogenesis of SARS-CoV, a reproducible and equivalent animal model is the need of the hour that can mimic the immune response in the host as well. Transgenic models are preferred to overcome this drawback, e.g., hACE2 transgenic mice, which show overexpression of the receptor ACE against the SARS-CoV [56]. Since mACE2 does not bind as efficiently with the virus as hACE2. Therefore hACE2 is the specific target for generating transgenic mice. Moreover, the expression of ACE2 being higher in transgenic hACE2 mice also result in a severe disease upon infection with the SARS-CoV in the epithelia of mice [57]. pK18-hACE2 transgenic mice were generated by cloning into pCR2.1-TOPO vector the amplified hACE2 coding sequence from IMAGE consortium clone ID 5243048. The final construct for generating transgenic mice contained a promoter and intron for human cytokeratin 18 (K18 gene) and the enhancer sequence obtained from the alfalfa mosaic virus upstream to the hACE2 coding sequence. Besides, 2 exons and 1 intron of K18 along with polyA signal tail were included for bringing higher specificity towards the epithelia in terms of selective translation in the downstream sequence [57, 58]. For the final generation of the mice, the transgene was injected into pronuclei of the fertilized mice eggs (C57BL/6J) for embryo generation and validated by PCR specific for transgene primers. In one of the recent reports, the SARS-CoV-2 viral agent responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic (one of the earlier isolates) was infected in transgenic hACE2 mice for determining the pathogenicity of the novel SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 mice [59]. As a result of this experimental infection, the mice lost weight and demonstrated interstitial pneumonia, known as the clinical signs of COVID-19 [59, 60]. Specific immunoglobulins (IgG) targeting SARS-CoV-2 were also observed in the lungs of transgenic hACE2 mice along with virus replication. More studies are needed to determine the immune response against the infection in these animals.

TMPRSS2 Knockout Mouse for Viral Entry and Pathogenesis Studies

Coronavirus fusion glycoproteins which are also known as spike proteins, are cleaved by transmembrane protease serine-type 2 (TMPSS2) belongs to a family of transmembrane serine protease type II. Thus activates the spike protein resulting in the fusion of the cell-virus membrane to facilitate the next step of infection further; the entry of the virus in the host cell [61-63]. There are reports which suggest that TMPRSS2 knockout mice are resistant to severe outcomes from infection by the influenza virus. At the same time, higher expression of this gene leads to severe outcomes after infection with the influenza virus [64, 65]. Mice deficient in TMPRSS2 are reported to have shown a reduced loss of weight and replication of viral agents in the lungs. It spreads the virus in the airways of the animals when infected with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV [61]. The viral entry of coronaviruses and influenza viruses depends critically on TMPRSS2 as the viral protein interacts and binds with ACE2 localized in the epithelia. Viral protein is cleaved by special proteases such as TMPRSS2 to activate the process of internalization of the virus, leading to the next phases of the infection [66]. SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses and influenza viruses require TMPRSS2 to activate the virus and its entry into the host cell for carrying the infection [62, 67, 68]. Therefore, TMPRSS2 can be placed at the center of the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and other pandemics of the past [69].

Since it has been established that TMPRSS2 is vital for entry of SARS-CoV-2 and involved in the dysregulation of ACE2. Therefore, it has been hypothesized by various accounts that it can play a vital role in preventing the critical circumstances of COVID-19 disease if used in a well-defined elaborated therapeutic strategy [70]. TMPRSS2 mediated entry of the SARS-CoV-2 can be inhibited by the serine protease inhibitor known as camostat mesylate [71, 72]. The envelope and plasma membrane fusion between SARS-CoV-2 mediated by TMPRSS2 and ACE2 can also be inhibited by nafamostat mesylate showing 10-times more efficacy than the camostat mesylate [73]. TMPRSS2 is now considered one of the most promising candidates as a therapeutic target for COVID-19. TMPRSS2 knockout mice model study indicated that the influenza virus entry into the cell is inhibited compared to wild-type mice, further implying the role of TMPRSS2 in regulating the pathogenesis of viruses as the crucial step of viral entry inhibition can lead to reduced mortality [74]. TMPRSS2 knockout mouse model can be generated in C57BL/6 Embryonic Stem Cells (ESCs) usually obtained from KOMP (knockout Mouse Project) repository. It is followed by injection of ESCs into blastocyst for generating chimeric mice, followed by male and female mice for creating homologous genotype [61, 75]. The viral kinetics observed in the lungs of TMPRSS2 knockout mice upon infection by SARS-CoV were reduced along with a reduced weight loss upon infection. Moreover, the inflammatory cytokine and chemokine response usually associated with such infections were also observed to be weakened in TMPRSS2 knockout mice [61]. For SARS-CoV-2 experimental infections in mice models, more studies need to be performed to understand the underlying mechanisms of the inflammation-mediated responses and immune responses generated via infections that lead to severe clinical circumstances of COVID-19 disease.

STAT1 Knockout Mouse for Studying Pneumonia and Antiviral Strategies

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) is considered one of the STAT family members of proteins involved in the signaling responses of the innate immune system. The signaling works by cytokines or growth factors that elicit response inside the cells, leading to phosphorylation of these proteins by the kinases associated with certain receptors, further causing the translocation of these proteins to the nucleus. One of the most important cytokine-mediated signalings in immune responses caused by viruses is interferon receptor signaling, which requires STAT1 responses [76]. The severe cases of COVID-19 show a cytokine storm phenotype, which is considered to be caused by SARS-CoV-2 nsp3 due to the de-mono-ADP-ribosylation of STAT1. It further highlights the importance of STAT1 as a therapeutic target in the precarious times of the COVID-19 pandemic [77]. A group of cytokines known as type 1 interferons (IFN-1) having further subtypes is known to be secreted by different cells like dendritic cells when pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) recognize the viral antigens or components [78]. IFN-1 is considered the first type of cytokine produced and released upon infection by a viral agent.

Interferon gets fixated upon interferon-α/β receptor (IFNAR), transcription factors including STAT1 are phosphorylated, leading to their translocation to the nucleus, further causing activation interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs). ISGs are known for the modulation of immune responses and signaling related to inflammatory pathways. After activation, ISGs lead to the further secretion of cytokines promoting adaptive immunity and interference with viral replication or spread and slowing down the cell's metabolism [79, 80]. Previously available IFN-1 treatment data on SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV can be valuable in determining the SARS-CoV-2 related mechanisms of pathogenesis and immune responses, as both of these viruses led to the disruption of the interferon signaling pathway. SARS-CoV Orf6 protein has been reported to inhibit the STAT1 transport to the nucleus upon interferon response by disrupting karyopherin transport [81, 82]. Therefore, STAT1 knockout models are important in understanding the role of viral proteins and their subsequent action in determining the immune response resulting from the infection [83]. The innate immune response that leads to clearance of the SARS-CoV also requires STAT1 activity, which modulates the IFN signaling [84]. IFN deficient mice showed that these components of innate immune responses are required STAT1 deficiency to prolong the viral shedding or susceptibility, allowing for lethal infection outcomes. STAT1 deficient mice data revealed the mechanistic role of these proteins in regulating SARS-CoV pathogenesis in the lungs.

Moreover, the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV seemed to be dependent on STAT1 and not on IFN subtypes, highlighting the role of STAT1 in controlling SARS especially viral replication, wound repairing, or cell proliferation in the lethal type disease [85]. Profibrotic phenotype resulting from the lethal outcome of SARS-CoV in the lungs of STAT1 knockout mice was also reported [86]. Therefore, the role of STAT1 in clearing the SARS-CoV-2 infection cannot be avoided and can be used in determining the therapeutic strategies for lethal conditions of COVID-19 [87]. Moreover, the role of STAT1 knockout, as highlighted in studies, demonstrated the role of an innate immune response about interferon signaling, can be utilized for potential therapeutic approaches for COVID-19.

Standard Mouse Strains (BALB/c mice, C57BL/6, and 129S6)

The development of COVID-19 therapy approaches along with vaccine studies, and preclinical investigations can be performed in these mice as they are known to support the replication of viral agents (SARS-CoV and MERS). The standard mice used in laboratory research, like BALB/c mice, C57BL/6, and 129S6, demonstrate the SARS-CoV replication along with other mice models in conjunction with the experimental designs [55]. Mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 infection in BALB/c mice showed severe symptoms compared to young mice, showing the clinical similarities observed in human patients of COVID-19 [88, 89]. Moreover, acute lung injury models have also been developed using C57BL/6 mice, which may further understand the therapeutic agent selection against ARDS associated with the severity of COVID-19 [90]. Similarly, 126S6 mice have been used in viral studies investigating the immune responses elicited upon viral infection [91].

Inbred Mice for Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Response Studies

Mouse strains of inbred nature that are available widely can also be adapted in the experimental designs to understand various parameters associated with the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of COVID-19. For example, age-related mortality can be studied in more detail in mouse models that are infected with SARS-CoV-2 [19]. The pneumonitis and clinical symptoms of SARS have been mimicked in several inbred mouse species, including BALB/c, C57BL/6, and 129S [84, 92-94]. The main reason for inbred mice being animals of choice for COVID-19 disease is their cost-effectiveness, smaller size, larger numbers to include a valid statistical output, and ease of manipulation at the genetic level [95]. 129S6 strain of mice is observed to report SARS susceptibility higher than BALB/c or B6 mice because the infection led to mild interstitial pneumonitis 2 days post-infection [84].

Similarly, TNF-alpha, a known pro-inflammatory cytokine, was reported at higher levels in BALB/c mice when recorded 2-9 days post-infection [94]. Age-related severity of SARS has already been demonstrated in aged BALB/c mice, which is observed in previous SARS outbreaks as well [93]. As seen in COVID-19 patients, viral replication is observed in the respiratory tract, and BALB/c also shows the same pattern of viral replication upon infection with viral agents in experimental conditions, leading to respiratory distress. Other clinical signs of weight loss, edema, dehydration, and pneumonitis were also observed in such mice strains when infected with SARS-CoV [96].

Humanized Immune System Mice for Vaccine Approaches

COVID-19 has overwhelmed many healthcare systems and has impacted economies negatively since its spread globally. If a COVID-19 vaccine becomes available for public immunization, life globally can go back to normalcy. Many vaccine candidates for COVID-19 are under investigation, and some are in clinical trials [74, 97]. Preclinical studies to develop an approach against SARS-CoV-2 require animal models corresponding to the immune responses as elicited in humans against the viral agent [98]. The antigens presented to the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC), however, vary between different species. Therefore, the mice models that can carry human leukocyte antigen genes can mimic the human response to the epitope-based vaccines and assist in developing or discovering the vaccines for COVID-19 in animal models [99].

Moreover, the vaccine discovery process can become rapid if the humanized immune system containing mice model is used for this purpose [100]. They can enhance the discovery process by speedily eliciting the response for efficacy studies and the immune response or memory generated upon vaccinated and un-immunized mice [37, 101-103]. Human immune cell engrafted mice have also been instrumental in determining the immune response for a vaccine candidate and include a promising approach in combating COVID-19 [104, 105]. Immuno-deficient mice, when engrafted with peripheral blood mononuclear cells, exhibit another vaccine modeling approach [106].

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Although there are many mice strains available that have assisted in understanding the pathogenesis of SARS and SARS-CoV previously, COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 presents a new challenge to the scientific community. Although mice and humans have shared genes, mice as in vivo replicas of COVID-19 or disease models require overcoming the challenges that are unique to the virus. The challenges include the model not possessing the receptor for the virus as human cells have mouse protein expression not being similar to human proteins. The binding affinity is different among viral and animal proteins. It also has a slightly distinct immune system among different species. Due to the aforementioned challenges, certain approaches have been utilized to overcome certain challenges, including transgenic mice representing the human version of certain aspects of the pathogenesis, knockout mice revealing the functions of intracellular programs required for the disease patterns, and inbred mice as age-related mortality models for disease, etc. In the end, mice models can also provide a great tool in discovering the therapeutic targets for the disease, which are not obvious at first but can be unearthed upon functional studies. Moreover, the information obtained through studies conducted in various types of mouse models consequently leads to the development phases of the vaccine or a drug target. Therefore, recently used immunized or immuno-deficient mice for investigating vaccine candidates or drug targets will ultimately lead to our understanding of rapidly concluding the different phases of discovery, therefore providing a gateway to quick response in times like COVID-19.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author confirms that this chapter contents have no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Declared none.

REFERENCES

[1]

Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020; 395(10223): 497-506.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5] [PMID: 31986264]

[2]

Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2020; 382(13): 1199-207.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001316] [PMID: 31995857]

[3]

Saadat S, Rawtani D, Hussain CM. Environmental perspective of COVID-19. Sci Total Environ 2020; 728: 138870.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138870] [PMID: 32335408]

[4]

Ross J. The exacerbation of burnout during COVID19: A major concern for nurse safety 2020. 35(4): 439–440.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2020.04.001]

[5]

Paraskevis D, Kostaki EG, Magiorkinis G, Panayiotakopoulos G, Sourvinos G, Tsiodras S. Full-genome evolutionary analysis of the novel corona virus (2019-nCoV) rejects the hypothesis of emergence as a result of a recent recombination event. Infect Genet Evol 2020; 79: 104212.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104212] [PMID: 32004758]

[6]

Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 2020; 579(7798): 265-9.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3] [PMID: 32015508]

[7]

World Health OrganizationWHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) 2020.

[8]

Verity R, Okell LC, Dorigatti I, et al. Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20(6): 669-77.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30243-7] [PMID: 32240634]

[9]

Onder G, Rezza G, Brusaferro S. Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to covid-19 in Italy. JAMA 2020; 323(18): 1775-6.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.4683] [PMID: 32203977]

[10]

Rajgor DD, Lee MH, Archuleta S, Bagdasarian N, Quek SC. The many estimates of the COVID-19 case fatality rate. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20(7): 776-7.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30244-9] [PMID: 32224313]

[11]

He W, Yi GY, Zhu Y. Estimation of the basic reproduction number, average incubation time, asymptomatic infection rate, and case fatality rate for COVID-19: Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis. J Med Virol 2020; 92(11): 2543-50.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26041] [PMID: 32470164]

[12]

He F, Deng Y, Li W. Coronavirus disease 2019: what we know? J Med Virol 2020; 92(7): 719-25.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25766] [PMID: 32170865]

[13]

Wang Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Qin Q. Unique epidemiological and clinical features of the emerging 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) implicate special control measures. J Med Virol 2020; 92(6): 568-76.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25748] [PMID: 32134116]

[14]

Gretebeck LM, Subbarao K. Animal models for SARS and MERS coronaviruses. Curr Opin Virol 2015; 13: 123-9.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2015.06.009] [PMID: 26184451]

[15]

Yong CY, Ong HK, Yeap SK, Ho KL, Tan WS. Recent advances in the vaccine development against middle east respiratory syndrome-coronavirus. Front Microbiol 2019; 10: 1781.[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01781] [PMID: 31428074]

[16]

Bartlett JG. Virology: SARS virus infection of cats and ferrets. Infect Dis Clin Pract 2004.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.idc.0000129853.80250.2c]

[17]

Roberts A, Wood J, Subbarao K, Ferguson M, Wood D, Cherian T. Animal models and antibody assays for evaluating candidate SARS vaccines: summary of a technical meeting 25-26 August 2005, London, UK. Vaccine 2006; 24(49-50): 7056-65.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.07.009] [PMID: 16930781]

[18]

Lamirande EW, DeDiego ML, Roberts A, et al. A live attenuated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus is immunogenic and efficacious in golden Syrian hamsters. J Virol 2008; 82(15): 7721-4.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00304-08] [PMID: 18463152]

[19]

Roberts A, Lamirande EW, Vogel L, et al. Animal models and vaccines for SARS-CoV infection. Virus Res 2008; 133(1): 20-32.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2007.03.025] [PMID: 17499378]

[20]

Zhao J, Li K, Wohlford-Lenane C, et al. Rapid generation of a mouse model for Middle East respiratory syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111(13): 4970-5.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323279111] [PMID: 24599590]

[21]

Yang XH, Deng W, Tong Z, et al. Mice transgenic for human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 provide a model for SARS coronavirus infection. Comp Med 2007; 57(5): 450-9.[PMID: 17974127]

[22]

Munster VJ, de Wit E, Feldmann H. Pneumonia from human coronavirus in a macaque model. N Engl J Med 2013; 368(16): 1560-2.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1215691] [PMID: 23550601]

[23]

Menachery VD, Gralinski LE, Mitchell HD, et al. Combination attenuation offers strategy for live attenuated coronavirus vaccines. J Virol 2018; 92(17): e00710-18.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00710-18] [PMID: 29976657]

[24]

Zhou Y, Jiang S, Du L. Prospects for a MERS-CoV spike vaccine. Expert Rev Vaccines 2018; 17(8): 677-86.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2018.1506702] [PMID: 30058403]

[25]

Cockrell AS, Yount BL, Scobey T, et al. A mouse model for MERS coronavirus-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat Microbiol 2016; 2: 16226.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.226] [PMID: 27892925]

[26]

Leist SR, Cockrell AS. Genetically engineering a susceptible mouse model for MERS-CoV-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods Mol Biol 2020; 2099: 137-59.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0211-9_12] [PMID: 31883094]

[27]

Dhama K, Sharun K, Tiwari R. COVID-19, an emerging coronavirus infection: advances and prospects in designing and developing vaccines, immunotherapeutics, and therapeutics 2020; 16(6): 1232-38.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1735227]

[28]

Doudna JA, Charpentier E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 2014. 346(6213).[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1258096]

[29]

Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 2013. 339(6121): 819-23.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1231143]

[30]

Pardee K, Green AA, Takahashi MK, et al. Rapid, low-cost detection of zika virus using programmable biomolecular components. Cell 2016; 165(5): 1255-66.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.059] [PMID: 27160350]

[31]

Guk K, Keem JO, Hwang SG, et al. A facile, rapid and sensitive detection of MRSA using a CRISPR-mediated DNA FISH method, antibody-like dCas9/sgRNA complex. Biosens Bioelectron 2017; 95: 67-71.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.04.016] [PMID: 28412663]

[32]

Myhrvold C, Freije CA, Gootenberg JS. Field-deployable viral diagnostics using CRISPR-Cas13. Science 2018. 360(6387): 444-448.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aas8836]

[33]

Kellner MJ, Koob JG, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Zhang F. SHERLOCK: nucleic acid detection with CRISPR nucleases. Nat Protoc 2019; 14(10): 2986-3012.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0210-2] [PMID: 31548639]

[34]

Xiang X, Qian K, Zhang Z, et al. CRISPR-cas systems based molecular diagnostic tool for infectious diseases and emerging 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia. J Drug Target 2020; 28(7-8): 727-31.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1061186X.2020.1769637] [PMID: 32401064]

[35]

Broughton JP, Deng X, Yu G, et al. CRISPR-Cas12-based detection of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Biotechnol 2020; 38(7): 870-4.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0513-4] [PMID: 32300245]

[36]

Wei J, Alfajaro M, Hanna R. Genome-wide CRISPR screen reveals host genes that regulate SARS-CoV-2 infection BioRxiv 2020.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.16.155101]

[37]

Soldatov VO, Kubekina MV, Silaeva YY, Bruter AV, Deykin AV. On the way from SARS-CoV-sensitive mice to murine COVID-19 model 2020. 6(2): 1-7[http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/rrpharmacology.6.53633]

[38]

Tipnis SR, Hooper NM, Hyde R, Karran E, Christie G, Turner AJ. A human homolog of angiotensin-converting enzyme. Cloning and functional expression as a captopril-insensitive carboxypeptidase. J Biol Chem 2000; 275(43): 33238-43.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M002615200] [PMID: 10924499]

[39]

Lambert DW, Yarski M, Warner FJ, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α convertase (ADAM17) mediates regulated ectodomain shedding of the severe-acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2). J Biol Chem 2005; 280(34): 30113-9.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M505111200] [PMID: 15983030]

[40]

Li W, Zhang C, Sui J, et al. Receptor and viral determinants of SARS-coronavirus adaptation to human ACE2. EMBO J 2005; 24(8): 1634-43.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600640] [PMID: 15791205]

[41]

To KF, Lo AWI. Exploring the pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): the tissue distribution of the coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and its putative receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). J Pathol 2004; 203(3): 740-3.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.1597] [PMID: 15221932]

[42]

Crackower MA, Sarao R, Oudit GY, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is an essential regulator of heart function. Nature 2002; 417(6891): 822-8.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature00786] [PMID: 12075344]

[43]

Hamming I, Timens W, Bulthuis MLC, Lely AT, Navis G, van Goor H. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J Pathol 2004; 203(2): 631-7.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.1570] [PMID: 15141377]

[44]

Jia HP, Look DC, Shi L, et al. ACE2 receptor expression and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection depend on differentiation of human airway epithelia. J Virol 2005; 79(23): 14614-21.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.79.23.14614-14621.2005] [PMID: 16282461]

[45]

Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 2020; 395(10224): 565-74.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8] [PMID: 32007145]

[46]

Hofmann H, Geier M, Marzi A, et al. Susceptibility to SARS coronavirus S protein-driven infection correlates with expression of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 and infection can be blocked by soluble receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004; 319(4): 1216-21.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.05.114] [PMID: 15194496]

[47]

Zhao Y, Zhao Z, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Ma Y, Zuo W. Single-Cell RNA expression profiling of ACE2, the receptor of SARS-CoV-2. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 202(5): 756-9.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202001-0179LE] [PMID: 32663409]

[48]

Rothe C, Schunk M, Sothmann P, et al. Transmission of 2019-NCOV infection from an asymptomatic contact in Germany. N Engl J Med 2020; 382(10): 970-1.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2001468] [PMID: 32003551]

[49]

Cao Y, Li L, Feng Z, et al. Comparative genetic analysis of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2) receptor ACE2 in different populations. Cell Discov 2020; 6: 11.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41421-020-0147-1] [PMID: 32133153]

[50]

Kuba K, Imai Y, Rao S, et al. A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury. Nat Med 2005; 11(8): 875-9.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm1267] [PMID: 16007097]

[51]

Imai Y, Kuba K, Rao S, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature 2005; 436(7047): 112-6.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03712] [PMID: 16001071]

[52]

Rey-Parra GJ, Vadivel A, Coltan L, et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 abrogates bleomycin-induced lung injury. J Mol Med (Berl) 2012; 90(6): 637-47.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00109-012-0859-2] [PMID: 22246130]

[53]

Treml B, Neu N, Kleinsasser A, et al. Recombinant angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 improves pulmonary blood flow and oxygenation in lipopolysaccharide-induced lung injury in piglets. Crit Care Med 2010; 38(2): 596-601.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c03009] [PMID: 19851091]

[54]

Khan A, Benthin C, Zeno B, et al. A pilot clinical trial of recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2017; 21(1): 234.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1823-x] [PMID: 28877748]

[55]

Subbarao K, Roberts A. Is there an ideal animal model for SARS? Trends Microbiol 2006; 14(7): 299-303.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2006.05.007] [PMID: 16759866]

[56]

Li W, Greenough TC, Moore MJ, et al. Efficient replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in mouse cells is limited by murine angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. J Virol 2004; 78(20): 11429-33.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.78.20.11429-11433.2004] [PMID: 15452268]

[57]

McCray PB, Jr, Pewe L, Wohlford-Lenane C, et al. Lethal infection of K18-hACE2 mice infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol 2007; 81(2): 813-21.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02012-06] [PMID: 17079315]

[58]

Koehler DR, Chow YH, Plumb J, et al. A human epithelium-specific vector optimized in rat pneumocytes for lung gene therapy. Pediatr Res 2000; 48(2): 184-90.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1203/00006450-200008000-00011] [PMID: 10926293]

[59]

Bao L, Deng W, Huang B, et al. The pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 transgenic mice. Nature 2020; 583(7818): 830-3.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2312-y] [PMID: 32380511]

[60]

Peeri NC, Shrestha N, Rahman MS, et al. The SARS, MERS and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemics, the newest and biggest global health threats: what lessons have we learned? Int J Epidemiol 2020; 49(3): 717-26.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa033] [PMID: 32086938]

[61]

Iwata-Yoshikawa N, Okamura T, Shimizu Y, Hasegawa H, Takeda M, Nagata N. TMPRSS2 contributes to virus spread and immunopathology in the airways of murine models after coronavirus infection. J Virol 2019; 93(6): e01815-18.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01815-18] [PMID: 30626688]

[62]

Matsuyama S, Nagata N, Shirato K, Kawase M, Takeda M, Taguchi F. Efficient activation of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein by the transmembrane protease TMPRSS2. J Virol 2010; 84(24): 12658-64.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01542-10] [PMID: 20926566]

[63]

Glowacka I, Bertram S, Müller MA, et al. Evidence that TMPRSS2 activates the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein for membrane fusion and reduces viral control by the humoral immune response. J Virol 2011; 85(9): 4122-34.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02232-10] [PMID: 21325420]

[64]

Tarnow C, Engels G, Arendt A, et al. TMPRSS2 is a host factor that is essential for pneumotropism and pathogenicity of H7N9 influenza A virus in mice. J Virol 2014; 88(9): 4744-51.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.03799-13] [PMID: 24522916]

[65]

Cheng Z, Zhou J, To KKW, et al. Identification of TMPRSS2 as a susceptibility gene for severe 2009 pandemic A(H1N1) influenza and A(H7N9) influenza. J Infect Dis 2015; 212(8): 1214-21.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiv246] [PMID: 25904605]

[66]

Böttcher E, Matrosovich T, Beyerle M, Klenk H-D, Garten W, Matrosovich M. Proteolytic activation of influenza viruses by serine proteases TMPRSS2 and HAT from human airway epithelium. J Virol 2006; 80(19): 9896-8.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01118-06] [PMID: 16973594]

[67]

Chaipan C, Kobasa D, Bertram S, et al. Proteolytic activation of the 1918 influenza virus hemagglutinin. J Virol 2009; 83(7): 3200-11.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02205-08] [PMID: 19158246]

[68]

Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 2020; 181(2): 271-280.e8.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052] [PMID: 32142651]

[69]

Stopsack KH, Mucci LA, Antonarakis ES, Nelson PS, Kantoff PW. TMPRSS2 and COVID-19: serendipity or opportunity for intervention? Cancer Discov 2020; 10(6): 779-82.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0451] [PMID: 32276929]

[70]

Xiao L, Sakagami H, Miwa N. ACE2: the key molecule for understanding the pathophysiology of severe and critical conditions of COVID-19: Demon or angel? Viruses 2020; 12(5): E491.[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12050491] [PMID: 32354022]

[71]

Djomkam ALZ, Olwal CO, Sala TB, Paemka L. Commentary: SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ace2 and tmprss2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 1448.[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01448] [PMID: 32974166]

[72]

University Y. Camostat mesylate in COVID-19 outpatients. Clin Trials 2020.

[73]

Hoffmann M, Schroeder S, Kleine-Weber H, Müller MA, Drosten C, Pöhlmann S. Nafamostat mesylate blocks activation of SARS-CoV-2: New treatment option for COVID-19. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 64(6): e00754-20.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00754-20] [PMID: 32312781]

[74]

Stahlmann R, Lode H. Medication for COVID-19-an overview of approaches currently under study. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020; 117(13): 213-9.[http://dx.doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2020.0213] [PMID: 32343658]

[75]

Sakai K, Ami Y, Tahara M, et al. The host protease TMPRSS2 plays a major role in in vivo replication of emerging H7N9 and seasonal influenza viruses. J Virol 2014; 88(10): 5608-16.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.03677-13] [PMID: 24600012]

[76]

Schneider WM, Chevillotte MD, Rice CM. Interferon-stimulated genes: a complex web of host defenses. Annu Rev Immunol 2014; 32: 513-45.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120231] [PMID: 24555472]

[77]

Claverie JM. A putative role of de-mono-ADP-ribosylation of STAT1 by the SARS-CoV-2 Nsp3 protein in the cytokine storm syndrome of COVID-19. Viruses 2020; 12(6): E646.[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12060646] [PMID: 32549200]

[78]

Liu YJ. IPC: professional type 1 interferon-producing cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors. Annu Rev Immunol 2005; 23: 275-306.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115633] [PMID: 15771572]

[79]

Ivashkiv LB, Donlin LT. Regulation of type I interferon responses. Nat Rev Immunol 2014; 14(1): 36-49.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri3581] [PMID: 24362405]

[80]

Schoggins JW, Rice CM. Interferon-stimulated genes and their antiviral effector functions. Curr Opin Virol 2011; 1(6): 519-25.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2011.10.008] [PMID: 22328912]

[81]

Frieman M, Yount B, Heise M, Kopecky-Bromberg SA, Palese P, Baric RS. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus ORF6 antagonizes STAT1 function by sequestering nuclear import factors on the rough endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi membrane. J Virol 2007; 81(18): 9812-24.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01012-07] [PMID: 17596301]

[82]

Kopecky-Bromberg SA, Martínez-Sobrido L, Frieman M, Baric RA, Palese P. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus open reading frame (ORF) 3b, ORF 6, and nucleocapsid proteins function as interferon antagonists. J Virol 2007; 81(2): 548-57.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01782-06] [PMID: 17108024]

[83]

Sallard E, Lescure FX, Yazdanpanah Y, Mentre F, Peiffer-Smadja N. Type 1 interferons as a potential treatment against COVID-19. Antiviral Res 2020; 178: 104791.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104791] [PMID: 32275914]

[84]

Hogan RJ, Gao G, Rowe T, et al. Resolution of primary severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus infection requires Stat1. J Virol 2004; 78(20): 11416-21.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.78.20.11416-11421.2004] [PMID: 15452265]

[85]

Frieman MB, Chen J, Morrison TE, et al. SARS-CoV pathogenesis is regulated by a STAT1 dependent but a type I, II and III interferon receptor independent mechanism. PLoS Pathog 2010; 6(4): e1000849.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000849] [PMID: 20386712]

[86]

Zornetzer GA, Frieman MB, Rosenzweig E, et al. Transcriptomic analysis reveals a mechanism for a prefibrotic phenotype in STAT1 knockout mice during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. J Virol 2010; 84(21): 11297-309.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01130-10] [PMID: 20702617]

[87]

Fung SY, Yuen KS, Ye ZW, Chan CP, Jin DY. A tug-of-war between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and host antiviral defence: lessons from other pathogenic viruses. Emerg Microbes Infect 2020; 9(1): 558-70.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1736644] [PMID: 32172672]

[88]

Gu H, Chen Q, Yang G. Rapid adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 in BALB/c mice: Novel mouse model for vaccine efficacy BioRxiv 2020.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.02.073411]

[89]

Dinnon KH, Leist SR, Schäfer A, Edwards CE, Martinez DR, Montgomery SA. A mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 model for the evaluation of COVID-19 medical countermeasures. BioRxiv 2020.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.06.081497]

[90]

Van den Steen PE, Geurts N, Deroost K, et al. Immunopathology and dexamethasone therapy in a new model for malaria-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181(9): 957-68.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200905-0786OC] [PMID: 20093644]

[91]

Lundberg P, Ramakrishna C, Brown J, et al. The immune response to herpes simplex virus type 1 infection in susceptible mice is a major cause of central nervous system pathology resulting in fatal encephalitis. J Virol 2008; 82(14): 7078-88.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00619-08] [PMID: 18480436]

[92]

Glass WG, Subbarao K, Murphy B, Murphy PM. Mechanisms of host defense following severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) pulmonary infection of mice. J Immunol 2004; 173(6): 4030-9.[http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.173.6.4030] [PMID: 15356152]

[93]

Roberts A, Deming D, Paddock CD, et al. A mouse-adapted SARS-coronavirus causes disease and mortality in BALB/c mice. PLoS Pathog 2007; 3(1): e5.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0030005] [PMID: 17222058]

[94]

Subbarao K, McAuliffe J, Vogel L, et al. Prior infection and passive transfer of neutralizing antibody prevent replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in the respiratory tract of mice. J Virol 2004; 78(7): 3572-7.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.78.7.3572-3577.2004] [PMID: 15016880]

[95]

Tuttle AH, Philip VM, Chesler EJ, Mogil JS. Comparing phenotypic variation between inbred and outbred mice. Nat Methods 2018; 15(12): 994-6.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0224-7] [PMID: 30504873]

[96]

Cleary SJ, Pitchford SC, Amison RT, et al. Animal models of mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 pathology. Br J Pharmacol 2020; 177(21): 4851-65.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.15143] [PMID: 32462701]

[97]

Corey L, Mascola JR, Fauci AS, Collins FS. A strategic approach to COVID-19 vaccine R & D. Science 2020; 368(6494): 948-50.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abc5312]

[98]

Li H, Zhou Y, Zhang M, Wang H, Zhao Q, Liu J. Updated approaches against SARS-CoV-2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 64(6): e00483-20.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00483-20] [PMID: 32205349]

[99]

Deb B, Shah H, Goel S. Current global vaccine and drug efforts against COVID-19: Pros and cons of bypassing animal trials. J Biosci 2020; 45: 82.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12038-020-00053-2] [PMID: 32554907]

[100]

Wang H, Zhang Y, Huang B, et al. Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate, BBIBP-CorV, with potent protection against SARS-CoV-2. Cell 2020; 182(3): 713-721.e9.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.008] [PMID: 32778225]

[101]

Lakdawala SS, Menachery VD. The search for a COVID-19 animal model. Science (80- ) 2020.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abc6141]

[102]

Cimolai N. Defining protective epitopes for COVID-19 vaccination models. J Med Virol 2020; 92(10): 1772-3.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25876] [PMID: 32285942]

[103]

Padron-Regalado E. Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2: Lessons from Other Coronavirus Strains. Infect Dis Ther 20201-20.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00300-x] [PMID: 32328406]

[104]

Janice Oh HL, Ken-En Gan S, Bertoletti A, Tan YJ. Understanding the T cell immune response in SARS coronavirus infection. Emerg Microbes Infect 2012; 1(9): e23.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emi.2012.26] [PMID: 26038429]

[105]

Florindo HF, Kleiner R, Vaskovich-Koubi D, et al. Immune-mediated approaches against COVID-19. Nat Nanotechnol 2020; 15(8): 630-45.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0732-3] [PMID: 32661375]

[106]

Brehm MA, Wiles MV, Greiner DL, Shultz LD. Generation of improved humanized mouse models for human infectious diseases. J Immunol Methods 2014; 410: 3-17.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2014.02.011] [PMID: 24607601]

Previous
Page
Next
Page

Contents

If you find an error or have any questions, please email us at admin@erenow.org. Thank you!